Literature DB >> 20546090

Complex genotype interactions influence social fitness during the developmental phase of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

N J Buttery1, C R L Thompson, J B Wolf.   

Abstract

When individuals interact, phenotypic variation can be partitioned into direct genetic effects (DGEs) of the individuals' own genotypes, indirect genetic effects (IGEs) of their social partners' genotypes and epistatic interactions between the genotypes of interacting individuals ('genotype-by-genotype (GxG) epistasis'). These components can all play important roles in evolutionary processes, but few empirical studies have examined their importance. The social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum provides an ideal system to measure these effects during social interactions and development. When starved, free-living amoebae aggregate and differentiate into a multicellular fruiting body with a dead stalk that holds aloft viable spores. By measuring interactions among a set of natural strains, we quantify DGEs, IGEs and GxG epistasis affecting spore formation. We find that DGEs explain most of the phenotypic variance (57.6%) whereas IGEs explain a smaller (13.3%) but highly significant component. Interestingly, GxG epistasis explains nearly a quarter of the variance (23.0%), highlighting the complex nature of genotype interactions. These results demonstrate the large impact that social interactions can have on development and suggest that social effects should play an important role in developmental evolution in this system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546090     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02032.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

1.  Autonomous and non-autonomous traits mediate social cooperation in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Nameeta Mujumdar; Ashvini Kumar Dubey; Krithi Nandimath; Vidyanand Nanjundiah
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Air-borne genotype by genotype indirect genetic effects are substantial in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  N O Rode; P Soroye; R Kassen; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Structured growth and genetic drift raise relatedness in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Neil J Buttery; Chandra N Jack; Boahemaa Adu-Oppong; Kate T Snyder; Christopher R L Thompson; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  A simple mechanism for complex social behavior.

Authors:  Katie Parkinson; Neil J Buttery; Jason B Wolf; Christopher R L Thompson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Fitness Trade-offs Result in the Illusion of Social Success.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf; Jennifer A Howie; Katie Parkinson; Nicole Gruenheit; Diogo Melo; Daniel Rozen; Christopher R L Thompson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A polychromatic 'greenbeard' locus determines patterns of cooperation in a social amoeba.

Authors:  Nicole Gruenheit; Katie Parkinson; Balint Stewart; Jennifer A Howie; Jason B Wolf; Christopher R L Thompson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Conditional expression explains molecular evolution of social genes in a microbe.

Authors:  Janaina Lima de Oliveira; Atahualpa Castillo Morales; Balint Stewart; Nicole Gruenheit; Jennifer Engelmoer; Suzanne Battom Brown; Reinaldo A de Brito; Laurence D Hurst; Araxi O Urrutia; Christopher R L Thompson; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Response thresholds alone cannot explain empirical patterns of division of labor in social insects.

Authors:  Yuko Ulrich; Mari Kawakatsu; Christopher K Tokita; Jonathan Saragosti; Vikram Chandra; Corina E Tarnita; Daniel J C Kronauer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Phenotypic and evolutionary consequences of social behaviours: interactions among individuals affect direct genetic effects.

Authors:  Barbora Trubenová; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.