Literature DB >> 20545662

Prospective evaluation of the change of predialysis protein-bound uremic solute concentration with postdilution online hemodiafiltration.

Natalie Meert1, Marie-Anne Waterloos, Maria Van Landschoot, Annemieke Dhondt, Ingrid Ledebo, Griet Glorieux, Jan Goeman, Johan Van der Eycken, Raymond Vanholder.   

Abstract

Although protein-bound uremic compounds have been related to outcome in observational studies, few current dialysis strategies provide more removal of those compounds than standard hemodialysis. We evaluated the evolution of protein-bound uremic solutes after a switch from high-flux hemodialysis to postdilution hemodiafiltration (n = 13). We compared predialysis solute concentration at 4, 5, and 9 weeks versus baseline for several protein-bound compounds and water-soluble solutes, as well as for beta(2)-microglobulin. After 9 weeks of postdilution hemodiafiltration, a significant decrease versus baseline could be detected for total concentration of protein-bound solutes: p-cresylsulfate (3.98 +/- 1.51-3.17 +/- 1.77 mg/dL, -20%, P < 0.01) and 3-carboxyl-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (0.72 +/- 0.52-0.64 +/- 0.46 mg/dL, -11%, P < 0.01). For the other protein-bound solutes, hippuric acid, indoleacetic acid, and indoxylsulfate, no change in total concentration could be detected. The concentration of the middle molecule, beta(2)-microglobulin, decreased as well after 9 weeks of postdilution hemodiafiltration (24.7 +/- 9.3-18.1 +/- 6.7 mg/L, -27%, P < 0.01). For water-soluble compounds, no significant change of concentration was found. Postdilution hemodiafiltration in comparison to high-flux hemodialysis provided significant reduction of predialysis concentration of protein-bound compounds, especially those with the highest protein binding, and of beta(2)-microglobulin, by -11 to -27% in 9 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20545662     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  23 in total

Review 1.  Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins.

Authors:  Flore Duranton; Gerald Cohen; Rita De Smet; Mariano Rodriguez; Joachim Jankowski; Raymond Vanholder; Angel Argiles
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Is hemodiafiltration ready for broader use?

Authors:  Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 3.  Hemodiafiltration: the addition of convective flow to hemodialysis.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Helen Fothergill; Arianne Zaloszyc; Laure Seuge
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  An update on uremic toxins.

Authors:  N Neirynck; R Vanholder; E Schepers; S Eloot; A Pletinck; G Glorieux
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  The membrane perspective of uraemic toxins: which ones should, or can, be removed?

Authors:  Sudhir K Bowry; Peter Kotanko; Rainer Himmele; Xia Tao; Michael Anger
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

7.  High-volume hemodiafiltration decreases the pre-dialysis concentrations of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate compared to hemodialysis: a post-hoc analysis from the HDFit randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jordana D Lima; Murilo Guedes; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Lia S Nakao; Silvia D Rodrigues; Ana Clara S Flórido; Andrea N Moreno-Amaral; Ana Beatriz Barra; Maria Eugênia Canziani; Américo Cuvello-Neto; Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.393

8.  Variation of clinical and laboratory features in chronic dialysis patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis after switching to online hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Remus Aurel Orasan; Ioan Mihai Patiu; Daniela Anghel; Cezarina Bejan; Ligia Iosub; Camelia Totolici; Mariana Pop; Carmen Turcea; Cristina Teodoru; Olga Hilda Orasan; Ina Maria Kacso; Mirela Gherman Caprioara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Online-haemodiafiltration vs. conventional haemodialysis: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Guillaume Jean; Jean-Marc Hurot; Patrik Deleaval; Brice Mayor; Christie Lorriaux
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  Indoxyl Sulfate-Review of Toxicity and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Sheldon C Leong; Tammy L Sirich
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.