Literature DB >> 20544709

The application of cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization to fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and subclassification of renal neoplasms.

Michael H Roh1, Paola Dal Cin, Stuart G Silverman, Edmund S Cibas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is an important diagnostic test for the evaluation and management of selected renal masses. Cytogenetic analysis of cytology specimens can serve as an adjunct for precise classification because certain tumors are associated with specific chromosomal aberrations. This study summarizes our experience with the application of conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to renal FNA specimens.
METHODS: All percutaneous renal FNAs performed during 2005 through 2008 were identified from the electronic pathology database. Results of cytogenetic and FISH analyses were correlated with the final diagnoses of the renal FNAs.
RESULTS: A total of 303 renal FNAs were performed. During an onsite assessment, a portion of the cytology specimen was allocated for cytogenetic analysis in 74 cases. Karyotypic analysis or FISH was successful in 44 (59%) of these. Characteristic chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 27 cases. In 17 cases, a karyotype revealed a combination of trisomies/tetrasomies and in another 5 cases, FISH revealed trisomy 7 and 17, both of which are consistent with papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Two cases showed 3p deletions consistent with clear cell RCC. Trisomy 3 was observed in 1 case of clear cell RCC. Monosomy 1 and 17 was observed in a case of papillary RCC comprised oncocytic cells. In 1 case of primary renal synovial sarcoma, FISH revealed a rearrangement at the SYT locus (18q11.2).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal FNA specimens are amenable to analysis by cytogenetics and FISH in the diagnosis and subclassification of renal neoplasms. Copyright 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20544709     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

1.  [Personalized urooncology based on molecular uropathology: part 1: what is diagnostic routine?].

Authors:  C G Stöhr; R Stöhr; A Rogler; K Amann; R Knüchel-Clarke; A Hartmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Primary Renal Synovial Sarcoma and Clinical and Pathological Findings: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leandro Blas; Javier Roberti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Significance of chromosome 9p status in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and quality of the reported studies.

Authors:  Ismail El-Mokadem; John Fitzpatrick; Bhavan Rai; J Cunningham; Norman Pratt; Stewart Fleming; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Optimizing detection of RET and PPARg rearrangements in thyroid neoplastic cells using a home-brew tetracolor probe.

Authors:  Paola Caria; Daniela V Frau; Tinuccia Dettori; Francesco Boi; Maria L Lai; Stefano Mariotti; Roberta Vanni
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Subtyping of renal cortical neoplasms in fine needle aspiration biopsies using a decision tree based on genomic alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Banumathy Gowrishankar; Lynnette Cahill; Alexandra E Arndt; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Oscar Lin; Kalyani Chadalavada; Seeta Chaganti; Gouri J Nanjangud; Vundavalli V Murty; Raju S K Chaganti; Victor E Reuter; Jane Houldsworth
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.588

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.