Literature DB >> 20543685

Fluid status and fluid responsiveness.

Sheldon Magder1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fluid boluses are a key element of hemodynamic resuscitation, but overuse of fluids also can be harmful. It is thus important to understand how fluids actually improve clinical problems and how one can predict fluid responsiveness. It is also important to understand potential limitations of fluid therapy. RECENT
FINDINGS: Currently there is a lot of attention being paid to the assessment of fluid responsiveness, but there is a lack of studies evaluating indications for fluid treatment and the potential harm from excess fluid use. This review emphasizes the physiological factors that determine the response to fluids, the limitations of these responses, and the predictors of fluid responsiveness. A key principle is that fluid resuscitation improves clinical indicators by increasing cardiac output, and if the volume infusion does not increase cardiac output there will be no benefit.
SUMMARY: Assessment of changes in cardiac output, either directly or indirectly, is a key component of managing fluid therapy. Avoiding harm with the use of fluids requires understanding what is physiologically possible.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20543685     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833b6bab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Anesthetic Predictors on Postpartum Hospital Length of Stay and Adverse Events Following Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study in 840 Consecutive Parturients.

Authors:  Ting Ting Oh; Colleen G Martel; Allison G Clark; Melissa B Russo; Bobby D Nossaman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

2.  Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial.

Authors:  Matthew R Lammi; Brianne Aiello; Gregory T Burg; Tayyab Rehman; Ivor S Douglas; Arthur P Wheeler; Bennett P deBoisblanc
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Appreciating the strengths and weaknesses of transthoracic echocardiography in hemodynamic assessments.

Authors:  Stephen J Huang; Anthony S McLean
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 1.866

4.  Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G V Cherpanath; B F Geerts; W K Lagrand; M J Schultz; A B J Groeneveld
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Ultrasound and NICOM in the assessment of fluid responsiveness in patients with mild sepsis in the emergency department: a pilot study.

Authors:  Martha Oord; Tycho J Olgers; Mirjam Doff-Holman; Mark P M Harms; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Jan C Ter Maaten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Predicting the Need for Fluid Therapy-Does Fluid Responsiveness Work?

Authors:  Hiroshi Ueyama; Sawami Kiyonaka
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2017-06-06

7.  Optimization of preload in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Adil Shujaat; Abubakr A Bajwa
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-07

Review 8.  Re-thinking resuscitation: leaving blood pressure cosmetics behind and moving forward to permissive hypotension and a tissue perfusion-based approach.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; Jukka Takala; Andreas Brunauer; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Anesthesia-Associated Relative Hypovolemia: Mechanisms, Monitoring, and Treatment Considerations.

Authors:  Jessica Noel-Morgan; William W Muir
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 10.  Effects of Fluids on the Macro- and Microcirculations.

Authors:  Victoria A Bennett; Alexander Vidouris; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.