Literature DB >> 20542574

Progress monitoring and feedback in psychiatric care reduces depressive symptoms.

Elizabeth A Newnham1, Geoff R Hooke, Andrew C Page.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, the monitoring of patient progress using standardized assessments has been neglected in hospital-based psychiatric care. Findings in outpatient psychotherapy have demonstrated clinically significant benefits for providing feedback to the sizeable minority of patients who were otherwise unlikely to experience positive outcome (Lambert, 2007). However, a similar system for presenting feedback on patient progress has not yet been assessed for group therapy within psychiatric inpatient settings. The current study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a feedback system suitable for use in psychiatric services.
METHODS: In a nonrandomized trial, 1308 consecutive inpatients and day patients, whose diagnoses were primarily depressive and anxiety disorders, completed the World Health Organization's Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) routinely during a ten-day cognitive behavioral therapy group. The first cohort (n=461) received treatment as usual. The second cohort (n=439) completed monitoring measures without feedback, and for patients in the third cohort (n=408), feedback on progress was provided to both clinicians and patients midway through the treatment period.
RESULTS: Feedback was effective in reducing depressive symptoms (F(1,649)=6.29, p<.05) for those patients at risk of poor outcome, but not effective in improving wellbeing (F(1,569)=1.14, p>.05). LIMITATIONS: The current findings may be generalized to patient samples that exhibit largely depressive disorders, however rigorous follow-up is warranted.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar to outpatient settings, feedback appears to be beneficial for improving symptom outcomes but further time may be required for wellbeing to be affected.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20542574     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  11 in total

1.  Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians.

Authors:  Aleksandra Matanov; Philip McNamee; Syeda Akther; Nick Barber; Victoria Bird
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 2.  Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.

Authors:  Tony Kendrick; Magdy El-Gohary; Beth Stuart; Simon Gilbody; Rachel Churchill; Laura Aiken; Abhishek Bhattacharya; Amy Gimson; Anna L Brütt; Kim de Jong; Michael Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-13

3.  Using daily monitoring of psychiatric symptoms to evaluate hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Andrew C Page; Nadia K Cunningham; Geoffrey R Hooke
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Transdiagnostic group CBT vs. standard group CBT for depression, social anxiety disorder and agoraphobia/panic disorder: Study protocol for a pragmatic, multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sidse M Arnfred; Ruth Aharoni; Morten Hvenegaard; Stig Poulsen; Bo Bach; Mikkel Arendt; Nicole K Rosenberg; Nina Reinholt
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Be a Mom's Efficacy in Enhancing Positive Mental Health among Postpartum Women Presenting Low Risk for Postpartum Depression: Results from a Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Fabiana Monteiro; Marco Pereira; Maria Cristina Canavarro; Ana Fonseca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Deanna E Wiebe; Shannon Remers; Pria Nippak; Julien Meyer
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  The measurement-based care to opioid treatment programs project (MBC2OTP): a study protocol using rapid assessment procedure informed clinical ethnography.

Authors:  Kelli Scott; John Guigayoma; Lawrence A Palinkas; Francesca L Beaudoin; Melissa A Clark; Sara J Becker
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 8.  Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dawid Gondek; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Elian Fink; Jessica Deighton; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

9.  Real-Time Monitoring of Psychotherapeutic Processes: Concept and Compliance.

Authors:  Günter Schiepek; Wolfgang Aichhorn; Martin Gruber; Guido Strunk; Egon Bachler; Benjamin Aas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 10.  How Are Information and Communication Technologies Supporting Routine Outcome Monitoring and Measurement-Based Care in Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patricia Gual-Montolio; Verónica Martínez-Borba; Juana María Bretón-López; Jorge Osma; Carlos Suso-Ribera
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.