Literature DB >> 20542385

Dose-volume histogram parameters and clinical factors associated with pleural effusion after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients.

Katsuyuki Shirai1, Yoshio Tamaki, Yoshizumi Kitamoto, Kazutoshi Murata, Yumi Satoh, Keiko Higuchi, Tetsuo Nonaka, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Hiroyuki Katoh, Takeo Takahashi, Takashi Nakano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the dose-volume histogram parameters and clinical factors as predictors of pleural effusion in esophageal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-three esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive CRT from January 2001 to March 2007 were reviewed retrospectively on the basis of the following criteria: pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer, available computed tomography scan for treatment planning, 6-month follow-up after CRT, and radiation dose ≥ 50 Gy. Exclusion criteria were lung metastasis, malignant pleural effusion, and surgery. Mean heart dose, mean total lung dose, and percentages of heart or total lung volume receiving ≥ 10-60 Gy (Heart-V(10) to V(60) and Lung-V(10) to V(60), respectively) were analyzed in relation to pleural effusion.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 26.9 months (range, 6.7-70.2) after CRT. Of the 43 patients, 15 (35%) developed pleural effusion. By univariate analysis, mean heart dose, Heart-V(10) to V(60), and Lung-V(50) to V(60) were significantly associated with pleural effusion. Poor performance status, primary tumor of the distal esophagus, and age ≥ 65 years were significantly related with pleural effusion. Multivariate analysis identified Heart-V(50) as the strongest predictive factor for pleural effusion (p = 0.01). Patients with Heart-V(50) <20%, 20%≤ Heart-V(50) <40%, and Heart-V(50) ≥ 40% had 6%, 44%, and 64% of pleural effusion, respectively (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Heart-V(50) is a useful parameter for assessing the risk of pleural effusion and should be reduced to avoid pleural effusion.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20542385     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Dosimetric Comparison Between Carbon-ion Radiotherapy and Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Takakusagi; Daisaku Yoshida; Yohsuke Kusano; Kio Kano; Wataru Anno; Keisuke Tsuchida; Nobutaka Mizoguchi; Itsuko Serizawa; Hiroyuki Katoh; Koh Imura; Yoshiki Takayama; Shinichi Minohara; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  A survey of changing trends in modelling radiation lung injury in mice: bringing out the good, the bad, and the uncertain.

Authors:  Mohamad B Dabjan; Carolyn Ms Buck; Isabel L Jackson; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Brian Marples; Julian D Down
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.662

3.  Bayesian variable selection for a semi-competing risks model with three hazard functions.

Authors:  Andrew G Chapple; Marina Vannucci; Peter F Thall; Steven Lin
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  The evolution of proton beam therapy: Current and future status.

Authors:  Xiufang Tian; Kun Liu; Yong Hou; Jian Cheng; Jiandong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-14

5.  Bayesian regression analyses of radiation modality effects on pericardial and pleural effusion and survival in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Liru He; Andrew Chapple; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Peter F Thall; Steven H Lin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Advanced techniques in neoadjuvant radiotherapy allow dose escalation without increased dose to the organs at risk : Planning study in esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K Fakhrian; M Oechsner; S Kampfer; T Schuster; M Molls; H Geinitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Clinical characteristics and dose-volume histogram parameters associated with the development of pleural effusions in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Sairaman Nagarajan; Sinae Kim; Inaya Ahmed; Shiby Paul; Eli D Scher; Matthew Listo; Andrew Chen; Joseph Aisner; Sabiha Hussain; Bruce G Haffty; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 8.  Radiation-induced heart disease in lung cancer radiotherapy: A dosimetric update.

Authors:  Xin Ming; Yuanming Feng; Chengwen Yang; Wei Wang; Ping Wang; Jun Deng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Long-term complications of definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using the classical method.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ito; Satoshi Itasaka; Katsuyuki Sakanaka; Norio Araki; Takashi Mizowaki; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Prognosis was not deteriorated by multiple primary cancers in esophageal cancer patients treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Shirai; Yoshio Tamaki; Yoshizumi Kitamoto; Kazutoshi Murata; Yumi Satoh; Keiko Higuchi; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Tetsuo Nonaka; Takeo Takahashi; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.