Literature DB >> 20542054

The contribution of the upper and lower face in happy and sad facial expression classification.

Mei-Yen Chen1, Chien-Chung Chen.   

Abstract

We used a happy/sad classification task and a psychophysical model to study the tuning properties of facial expression processors across viewing conditions. Using morphed faces, in this study we measured the extent to which classification of facial expressions depends on the intensity of a particular expression on either the upper or lower face. In the fovea, the upper and lower parts of the test image were either aligned or had a lateral shift of 44' visual angle. In the periphery, the aligned test image was placed at a 6 degrees visual angle to the left of the fixation. Observers were asked to classify a test image of a facial expression as happy or sad. We discovered that the alignment of the upper and lower halves of the face had no effect on happy/sad classification in the fovea, suggesting that the classification of facial expressions is an analytic process. The model also showed no interaction between the two halves of the face in foveal facial expression classification. In addition, the poor performance of observers in recognizing happiness in the periphery manifests a computational complexity, suggesting a model in which the happy-face processor relies on both facial features and the interaction between them to recognize happiness in the periphery. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20542054     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Face masks affect perception of happy faces in deaf people.

Authors:  Maria Bianca Amadeo; Andrea Escelsior; Mario Amore; Gianluca Serafini; Beatriz Pereira da Silva; Monica Gori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Behavioral dissociation between emotional and non-emotional facial expressions in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Roberta Daini; Chiara M Comparetti; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Facial Expression Aftereffect Revealed by Adaption to Emotion-Invisible Dynamic Bubbled Faces.

Authors:  Chengwen Luo; Qingyun Wang; Philippe G Schyns; Frederick A A Kingdom; Hong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Contextual perception under active inference.

Authors:  M Berk Mirza; Maell Cullen; Thomas Parr; Sukhi Shergill; Rosalyn J Moran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia.

Authors:  David Alais; Yiben Xu; Susan G Wardle; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Categorical Perception of Fear and Anger Expressions in Whole, Masked and Composite Faces.

Authors:  Martin Wegrzyn; Isabelle Bruckhaus; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceived emotional expressions of composite faces.

Authors:  Markku Kilpeläinen; Viljami Salmela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.