Literature DB >> 20541983

DNA ligase 4 stabilizes the ribosomal DNA array upon fork collapse at the replication fork barrier.

Olivier Fritsch1, Martin D Burkhalter, Sanja Kais, José M Sogo, Primo Schär.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) were shown to occur at the replication fork barrier in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 2D-gel electrophoresis. Their origin, nature and magnitude, however, have remained elusive. We quantified these DSBs and show that a surprising 14% of replicating ribosomal DNA molecules are broken at the replication fork barrier in replicating wild-type cells. This translates into an estimated steady-state level of 7-10 DSBs per cell during S-phase. Importantly, breaks detectable in wild-type and sgs1 mutant cells differ from each other in terms of origin and repair. Breaks in wild-type, which were previously reported as DSBs, are likely an artefactual consequence of nicks nearby the rRFB. Sgs1 deficient cells, in which replication fork stability is compromised, reveal a class of DSBs that are detectable only in the presence of functional Dnl4. Under these conditions, Dnl4 also limits the formation of extrachromosomal ribosomal DNA circles. Consistently, dnl4 cells displayed altered fork structures at the replication fork barrier, leading us to propose an as yet unrecognized role for Dnl4 in the maintenance of ribosomal DNA stability. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541983     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  10 in total

1.  Resolution by unassisted Top3 points to template switch recombination intermediates during DNA replication.

Authors:  M Rebecca Glineburg; Alejandro Chavez; Vishesh Agrawal; Steven J Brill; F Brad Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast.

Authors:  Charlene H Emerson; Alison A Bertuch
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.626

3.  Active RNAP pre-initiation sites are highly mutated by cytidine deaminases in yeast, with AID targeting small RNA genes.

Authors:  Benjamin J M Taylor; Yee Ling Wu; Cristina Rada
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Ribosomal RNA gene repeats associate with the nuclear pore complex for maintenance after DNA damage.

Authors:  Chihiro Horigome; Eri Unozawa; Takamasa Ooki; Takehiko Kobayashi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Top1p targeting by Fob1p at the ribosomal Replication Fork Barrier does not account for camptothecin sensitivity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.

Authors:  Pardis Pourali; Philippe Pasero; Benjamin Pardo
Journal:  MicroPubl Biol       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 6.  Role and Regulation of Pif1 Family Helicases at the Replication Fork.

Authors:  Emory G Malone; Matthew D Thompson; Alicia K Byrd
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  MRX protects fork integrity at protein-DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context.

Authors:  Iben B Bentsen; Ida Nielsen; Michael Lisby; Helena B Nielsen; Souvik Sen Gupta; Kamilla Mundbjerg; Anni H Andersen; Lotte Bjergbaek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Interference between DNA replication and transcription as a cause of genomic instability.

Authors:  Yea-Lih Lin; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Reversible Top1 cleavage complexes are stabilized strand-specifically at the ribosomal replication fork barrier and contribute to ribosomal DNA stability.

Authors:  Claudia Krawczyk; Vincent Dion; Primo Schär; Olivier Fritsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Common Features of the Pericentromere and Nucleolus.

Authors:  Colleen J Lawrimore; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.