Literature DB >> 20541672

Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer.

Fernand Labrie1.   

Abstract

Of all cancers, prostate cancer is the most sensitive to hormones: it is thus very important to take advantage of this unique property and to always use optimal androgen blockade when hormone therapy is the appropriate treatment. A fundamental observation is that the serum testosterone concentration only reflects the amount of testosterone of testicular origin which is released in the blood from which it reaches all tissues. Recent data show, however, that an approximately equal amount of testosterone is made from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) directly in the peripheral tissues, including the prostate, and does not appear in the blood. Consequently, after castration, the 95-97% fall in serum testosterone does not reflect the 40-50% testosterone (testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) made locally in the prostate from DHEA of adrenal origin. In fact, while elimination of testicular androgens by castration alone has never been shown to prolong life in metastatic prostate cancer, combination of castration (surgical or medical with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist) with a pure anti-androgen has been the first treatment shown to prolong life. Most importantly, when applied at the localized stage, the same combined androgen blockade (CAB) can provide long-term control or cure of the disease in more than 90% of cases. Obviously, since prostate cancer usually grows and metastasizes without signs or symptoms, screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is absolutely needed to diagnose prostate cancer at an 'early' stage before metastasis occurs and the cancer becomes non-curable. While the role of androgens was believed to have become non-significant in cancer progressing under any form of androgen blockade, recent data have shown increased expression of the androgen receptor (AR) in treatment-resistant disease with a benefit of further androgen blockade. Since the available anti-androgens have low affinity for AR and cannot block androgen action completely, especially in the presence of increased AR levels, it becomes important to discover more potent and purely antagonistic blockers of AR. The data obtained with compounds under development are promising. While waiting for this (these) new anti-androgen(s), combined treatment with castration and a pure anti-androgen (bicalutamide, flutamide or nilutamide) is the only available and the best scientifically based means of treating prostate cancer by hormone therapy at any stage of the disease with the optimal chance of success and even cure in localized disease. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541672     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(10)82014-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of serum testosterone levels in prostate cancer patients receiving LHRH agonist therapy with or without the removal of the prostate.

Authors:  Seetha Venkateswaran; David Margel; Stanley Yap; Karen Hersey; Paul Yip; Neil Eric Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The type of patients who would benefit from anti-androgen withdrawal therapy: could it be performed safely for aggressive prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Nozomi Hayakawa; Taisuke Ezaki; Kenjiro Suzuki; Takahiro Maeda; Akiharu Ninomiya; So Nakamura
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  A semi-mechanistic integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of the testosterone effects of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprolide in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Chay Ngee Lim; Ahmed Hamed Salem
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: report of 102 cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Nozomi Hayakawa; Taisuke Ezaki; Kenjiro Suzuki; Takahiro Maeda; Akiharu Ninomiya; So Nakamura
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Regulation of HMGB3 by antitumor miR-205-5p inhibits cancer cell aggressiveness and is involved in prostate cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  Yasutaka Yamada; Rika Nishikawa; Mayuko Kato; Atsushi Okato; Takayuki Arai; Satoko Kojima; Kazuto Yamazaki; Yukio Naya; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Naohiko Seki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Gonadotropin‑releasing hormone inhibits the proliferation and motility of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Loong Hung Teng; Munirah Ahmad; Wayne Tiong Weng Ng; Subathra Sabaratnam; Maria Ithaya Rasan; Ishwar Parhar; Alan Soo Beng Khoo
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  Treatment strategy for metastatic prostate cancer with extremely high PSA level: reconsidering the value of vintage therapy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Yamada; Shinichi Sakamoto; Yoshiyasu Amiya; Makoto Sasaki; Takayuki Shima; Akira Komiya; Noriyuki Suzuki; Koichiro Akakura; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Hiroomi Nakatsu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Role of YY1 in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and correlation with bioinformatic data sets of gene expression.

Authors:  Vaishali Kashyap; Benjamin Bonavida
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2014-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.