Literature DB >> 20541577

Biomonitoring Equivalents for triclosan.

Kannan Krishnan1, Michelle Gagné, Andy Nong, Lesa L Aylward, Sean M Hays.   

Abstract

Recent efforts worldwide have resulted in a growing database of measured concentrations of chemicals in blood and urine samples taken from the general population. However, few tools exist to assist in the interpretation of the measured values in a health risk context. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) are defined as the concentration or range of concentrations of a chemical or its metabolite(s) in a biological medium (blood, urine, or other medium) consistent with an existing health-based exposure guideline, and are derived by integrating available data on pharmacokinetics with existing chemical risk assessments. This study reviews available health-based exposure guidance values for triclosan based on recent evaluations from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (EC SCCP) and the Australian National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS). BE values corresponding to the reference dose (RfD) or margin of safety (MOS) targets from these agencies were derived based on kinetic data (urinary excretion and plasma clearance) from human studies and measured blood concentration data in animal studies. Estimated BE values for urinary total triclosan (free plus conjugates) corresponding to the US EPA RfD and the EC-identified margin of safety target from the NOAEL are 6.4 and 2.6 mg/L, respectively (corresponding to 8.3 and 3.3mg/g creatinine, respectively). Plasma BE values corresponding to the US EPA, EC, and Australian NICNAS values are 0.3, 0.9, and 0.4 mg/L, respectively. These values may be used as screening tools for evaluation of population biomonitoring data for triclosan in a risk assessment context. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541577     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Christopher R Kirman; Rita Schoeny; Christopher J Portier; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 2.  Role of environmental contaminants in the etiology of Alzheimer's disease: a review.

Authors:  Manivannan Yegambaram; Bhagyashree Manivannan; Thomas G Beach; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Preimplantation Exposure to Bisphenol A and Triclosan May Lead to Implantation Failure in Humans.

Authors:  Mu Yuan; Ming-Zhu Bai; Xu-Feng Huang; Yue Zhang; Jing Liu; Min-Hao Hu; Wei-Qian Zheng; Fan Jin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Maternal Urinary Triclosan Concentration in Relation to Maternal and Neonatal Thyroid Hormone Levels: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Fengxiu Ouyang; Liping Feng; Xia Wang; Zhiwei Liu; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Comparison of methods for calculating the health costs of endocrine disrupters: a case study on triclosan.

Authors:  Radka Prichystalova; Jean-Baptiste Fini; Leonardo Trasande; Martine Bellanger; Barbara Demeneix; Laura Maxim
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Variation in urinary spot sample, 24 h samples, and longer-term average urinary concentrations of short-lived environmental chemicals: implications for exposure assessment and reverse dosimetry.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Sean M Hays; Angelika Zidek
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Maternal urinary triclosan level, gestational diabetes mellitus and birth weight in Chinese women.

Authors:  Fengxiu Ouyang; Ning Tang; Hui-Juan Zhang; Xia Wang; Shasha Zhao; Weiye Wang; Jun Zhang; Weiwei Cheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Exposure to free and conjugated forms of bisphenol A and triclosan among pregnant women in the MIREC cohort.

Authors:  Tye E Arbuckle; Leonora Marro; Karelyn Davis; Mandy Fisher; Pierre Ayotte; Patrick Bélanger; Pierre Dumas; Alain LeBlanc; René Bérubé; Éric Gaudreau; Gilles Provencher; Elaine M Faustman; Eric Vigoren; Adrienne S Ettinger; Michael Dellarco; Susan MacPherson; William D Fraser
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Identifying and Characterizing Stress Pathways of Concern for Consumer Safety in Next-Generation Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Sarah Hatherell; Maria T Baltazar; Joe Reynolds; Paul L Carmichael; Matthew Dent; Hequn Li; Stephanie Ryder; Andrew White; Paul Walker; Alistair M Middleton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Relationship between triclosan exposure and thyroid hormones: the Second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2012-2014).

Authors:  Na-Young Ha; Dae Hwan Kim; Ji Young Ryu
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-09-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.