PURPOSE: It remains unclear whether population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men reduces all-cause long-term mortality. We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of AAA screening for prevention of long-term mortality in men. METHODS: To identify all randomized controlled trials of population-based AAA screening with long-term (≥ 10 year) follow-up in men, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 2009. Data regarding AAA-related and all-cause mortality (including Cox regression hazard ratios [HRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were abstracted from each individual study. For each study, data regarding mortality in both the screening and control groups were used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs or HRs (or risk ratios where no HR was reported) in both fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS: Our search identified four randomized controlled trials of population-based AAA screening with long-term follow-up in men aged ≥ 65 years. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in AAA-related mortality (random-effects OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; P = .008; P for heterogeneity = .01; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 4 per 1000; number needed to screen [NNS], 238; random-effects HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.86; P = .009; P for heterogeneity = .009) and revealed a statistically nonsignificant reduction (but a strong trend toward a significant reduction) in all-cause mortality (fixed-effects OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.00 [1.001]; P = .06; P for heterogeneity = .93; ARR, 5 per 1000; NNS, 217; fixed-effects HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.00 [1.0001]; P ≥ .05 [P = .052]; P for heterogeneity = .74) with AAA screening relative to control. CONCLUSION: The results of our analysis suggest that population-based screening for AAA reduces AAA-related long-term mortality by 4 per 1000 over control in men aged ≥ 65 years. Whereas, screening for AAA shows a strong trend toward a significant reduction in all-cause long-term mortality by 5 per 1000, which does not narrowly reach statistical significance.
PURPOSE: It remains unclear whether population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men reduces all-cause long-term mortality. We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of AAA screening for prevention of long-term mortality in men. METHODS: To identify all randomized controlled trials of population-based AAA screening with long-term (≥ 10 year) follow-up in men, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 2009. Data regarding AAA-related and all-cause mortality (including Cox regression hazard ratios [HRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were abstracted from each individual study. For each study, data regarding mortality in both the screening and control groups were used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic ORs or HRs (or risk ratios where no HR was reported) in both fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS: Our search identified four randomized controlled trials of population-based AAA screening with long-term follow-up in men aged ≥ 65 years. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in AAA-related mortality (random-effects OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; P = .008; P for heterogeneity = .01; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 4 per 1000; number needed to screen [NNS], 238; random-effects HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.86; P = .009; P for heterogeneity = .009) and revealed a statistically nonsignificant reduction (but a strong trend toward a significant reduction) in all-cause mortality (fixed-effects OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.00 [1.001]; P = .06; P for heterogeneity = .93; ARR, 5 per 1000; NNS, 217; fixed-effects HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.00 [1.0001]; P ≥ .05 [P = .052]; P for heterogeneity = .74) with AAA screening relative to control. CONCLUSION: The results of our analysis suggest that population-based screening for AAA reduces AAA-related long-term mortality by 4 per 1000 over control in men aged ≥ 65 years. Whereas, screening for AAA shows a strong trend toward a significant reduction in all-cause long-term mortality by 5 per 1000, which does not narrowly reach statistical significance.
Authors: Georgios A Pitoulias; Konstantinos P Donas; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Giovanni Torsello; Dimitrios K Papadimitriou Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Matthew A Bartek; Larry G Kessler; Jennifer M Talbott; Jimmy Nguyen; Sherene Shalhub Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Seamus C Harrison; Michael V Holmes; Stephen Burgess; Folkert W Asselbergs; Gregory T Jones; Annette F Baas; F N van 't Hof; Paul I W de Bakker; Jan D Blankensteijn; Janet T Powell; Athanasios Saratzis; Gert J de Borst; Daniel I Swerdlow; Yolanda van der Graaf; Andre M van Rij; David J Carey; James R Elmore; Gerard Tromp; Helena Kuivaniemi; Robert D Sayers; Nilesh J Samani; Matthew J Bown; Steve E Humphries Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Seamus C Harrison; Anastasia Z Kalea; Michael V Holmes; Obi Agu; Steve E Humphries Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Ignacio Manuel Sánchez Barrancos; Francisco José Guerrero García; María Del Carmen Rico López; Vicente Fernández Rodríguez; Tomás Vegas Jiménez; Rafael Alonso Roca; Daniel Domínguez Tristancho Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 1.137