Literature DB >> 20541208

A non-optimized follower load path may cause considerable intervertebral rotations.

Marcel Dreischarf1, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann, Antonius Rohlmann.   

Abstract

Osseoligamentous spinal specimens buckle under even a small vertical compressive force. To allow higher axial forces, a compressive follower load (FL) was suggested previously that approximates the curvature of the spine without inducing intervertebral rotation in both the frontal and the sagittal planes. In in vitro experiments and finite element analyses, the location of the FL path is subjected to estimation by the investigator. Such non-optimized FLs may induce bending and so far it is still unknown how this affects the results of the study and their comparability. A symmetrical finite element model of the lumbar spine was employed to simulate upright standing while applying a follower load. In analogy to in vitro experiments, the path of this FL was estimated seven times by different members of our institute's spine group. Additionally, an optimized FL path was determined and additional moments of +/-7.5Nm were applied to simulate flexion and extension. Application of the optimized 500N compressive FL causes only a marginal alteration of the curvature (cardan angle L1-S1 in sagittal plane <0.25 degrees). An individual estimation of the FL path, however, results in flexions of up to 10.0 degrees or extensions of up to 12.3 degrees. The resulting angles for the different non-optimized FL paths depend on the magnitude of the bending moment applied and whether a differential or an absolute measurement is taken. A preceding optimization of the location of the FL path would increase the comparability of different studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20541208     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of Intervertebral ROM in Multi-Level Cadaveric Lumbar Spines Using Distinct Pure Moment Loading Approaches.

Authors:  Brandon Santoni; Andres F Cabezas; Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; James B Billys; Benjamin Whiting; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 1: misalignment of the vertebrae adjacent to a total disc replacement affects the facet joint and facet capsule forces in a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; S Lauterborn; M Dreischarf; H Schmidt; M Putzier; P Strube; T Zander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effects of rod stiffness and fusion mass on the adjacent segments after floating mono-segmental fusion: a study using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yong Jun Jin; Young Eun Kim; Jung Ho Seo; Hae Won Choi; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A combined numerical and experimental technique for estimation of the forces and moments in the lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Hemanth R Gadikota; Jun Miao; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Simulation of L-4 lumbar spine model of motorist exposed to vibration from speed hump.

Authors:  B Jain A R Tony; M S Alphin; G Sri Krishnan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-27

8.  Sagittal plane rotation center of lower lumbar spine during a dynamic weight-lifting activity.

Authors:  Zhan Liu; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Shaobai Wang; Minfei Wu; Weiye Zhong; Jing-Sheng Li; Thomas Cha; Kirk Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina A Gonzalez-Blohm; James J Doulgeris; William E Lee; Thomas M Shea; Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Lumbar spinal ligament characteristics extracted from stepwise reduction experiments allow for preciser modeling than literature data.

Authors:  Nicolas Damm; Robert Rockenfeller; Karin Gruber
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.