BACKGROUND: The metabolic/biotransformation pathways of atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) have been characterized and reviewed. However, comparisons of excretory pathways remain unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the excretion profile of atypical antipsychotic agents and compare the overall magnitude of metabolism (changed vs. unchanged drug) and route of excretion (feces vs. urine). Secondary objectives include providing: 1) dosing information in hepatic and renal impairment, and 2) context of the specific enzymes and pathways involved in each agents' biotransformation. METHODS: Published literature and each manufacturer's radiolabeled drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion data and U.S. prescribing information were reviewed. RESULTS: With the exception of paliperidone, atypical antipsychotics undergo extensive metabolism (i.e., <or=50% of dose recovered unchanged). Quetiapine undergoes the greatest overall metabolism (<1% of the dose recovered unchanged) and paliperidone the least (59% recovered unchanged in the urine). Between-agent differences exist in the extent of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) metabolism and the specific isozymes involved. After administration of a radioactive dose, fecal elimination of unchanged drug plus metabolites ranged from 11% (paliperidone) to 71% (ziprasidone) and renal elimination ranged from 21% (ziprasidone) to 80% (paliperidone). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the differences in the elimination profiles of atypical antipsychotics agents may permit better-informed drug and dose selection in special populations such as those with comorbid conditions (e.g. hepatitis, diabetes, end-stage renal disease) or pharmacogenetic variability; or at risk for drug-drug interactions. The use of patient tailored drug and dose-selection may result in greater treatment efficacy and a reduction in adverse events.
BACKGROUND: The metabolic/biotransformation pathways of atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, clozapine, iloperidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) have been characterized and reviewed. However, comparisons of excretory pathways remain unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the excretion profile of atypical antipsychotic agents and compare the overall magnitude of metabolism (changed vs. unchanged drug) and route of excretion (feces vs. urine). Secondary objectives include providing: 1) dosing information in hepatic and renal impairment, and 2) context of the specific enzymes and pathways involved in each agents' biotransformation. METHODS: Published literature and each manufacturer's radiolabeled drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion data and U.S. prescribing information were reviewed. RESULTS: With the exception of paliperidone, atypical antipsychotics undergo extensive metabolism (i.e., <or=50% of dose recovered unchanged). Quetiapine undergoes the greatest overall metabolism (<1% of the dose recovered unchanged) and paliperidone the least (59% recovered unchanged in the urine). Between-agent differences exist in the extent of cytochrome P450 (CYP450) metabolism and the specific isozymes involved. After administration of a radioactive dose, fecal elimination of unchanged drug plus metabolites ranged from 11% (paliperidone) to 71% (ziprasidone) and renal elimination ranged from 21% (ziprasidone) to 80% (paliperidone). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the differences in the elimination profiles of atypical antipsychotics agents may permit better-informed drug and dose selection in special populations such as those with comorbid conditions (e.g. hepatitis, diabetes, end-stage renal disease) or pharmacogenetic variability; or at risk for drug-drug interactions. The use of patient tailored drug and dose-selection may result in greater treatment efficacy and a reduction in adverse events.
Authors: Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Liana Wermelinger de Matos; Maria de Fátima Dos Santos Sampaio; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Natalia I Brzozowska; Erik J de Tonnerre; Kong M Li; Xiao Suo Wang; Aurelie A Boucher; Paul D Callaghan; Michael Kuligowski; Alex Wong; Jonathon C Arnold Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Zhang-Jin Zhang; Qing-Rong Tan; Yao Tong; Xue-Yi Wang; Huai-Hai Wang; Lai-Ming Ho; Hei Kiu Wong; Yi-Bin Feng; Di Wang; Roger Ng; Grainne M McAlonan; Chuan-Yue Wang; Vivian Taam Wong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: James Ermer; Mary B Haffey; Cynthia Richards; Kenneth Lasseter; Benno Roesch; Jaideep Purkayastha; Mary Corcoran; Bree Harlin; Patrick Martin Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.859