Literature DB >> 20540503

Accounting for polarization cost when using fixed charge force fields. I. Method for computing energy.

William C Swope1, Hans W Horn, Julia E Rice.   

Abstract

Although it is not currently standard practice, the cost to change the electronic polarization from one appropriate for the gas phase to that implied by the charge model should be considered when deriving force fields based on fits to certain types of experimental data and for using force fields to compute observables that involve changes in molecular polarization. We present mathematical expressions and a method to estimate this polarization cost implied by a fixed charge model force field, where the fixed charge model can be any combination of point charges, higher-order multipoles, or even distributed charge densities, as long as they do not change in response to environment. These expressions illuminate the relationship between polarization costs associated with fixed charge models, self-polarization energies of polarizable models, and quantum chemical based approaches that use continuum representations of the solvent, such as the self-consistent reaction field and polarizable continuum models. The technique takes account of the tensorial nature of the polarizabilities and includes quadrupole as well as dipole polarization. The consistency of this approach to one that estimates polarization cost using an implicit solvent quantum chemistry method (PCM) is demonstrated.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20540503     DOI: 10.1021/jp911699p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  15 in total

1.  Soft-core potentials in thermodynamic integration: comparing one- and two-step transformations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; InSuk Joung; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Testing the semi-explicit assembly model of aqueous solvation in the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Libo Li; Ken A Dill; Christopher J Fennell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Applicability of a thermodynamic cycle approach for a force field parametrization targeting non-aqueous solvation free energies.

Authors:  Andreas Mecklenfeld; Gabriele Raabe
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Charge equilibration force fields for molecular dynamics simulations of lipids, bilayers, and integral membrane protein systems.

Authors:  Timothy R Lucas; Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

5.  1.14*CM1A-LBCC: Localized Bond-Charge Corrected CM1A Charges for Condensed-Phase Simulations.

Authors:  Leela S Dodda; Jonah Z Vilseck; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Integration of Experimental Data and Use of Automated Fitting Methods in Developing Protein Force Fields.

Authors:  Marcelo D Polêto; Justin A Lemkul
Journal:  Commun Chem       Date:  2022-03-18

7.  Simple electrolyte solutions: comparison of DRISM and molecular dynamics results for alkali halide solutions.

Authors:  In Suk Joung; Tyler Luchko; David A Case
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Nonaqueous Condensed-Phase Modeling.

Authors:  Leela S Dodda; Jonah Z Vilseck; Kara J Cutrona; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Derivation of fixed partial charges for amino acids accommodating a specific water model and implicit polarization.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; Julia E Rice; William C Swope; David A Case
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Revised AMBER parameters for bioorganic phosphates.

Authors:  T Steinbrecher; J Latzer; D A Case
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.