Literature DB >> 20539932

Learning style preferences of Australian health science students.

Maryam Zoghi1, Ted Brown, Brett Williams, Louis Roller, Shapour Jaberzadeh, Claire Palermo, Lisa McKenna, Caroline Wright, Marilyn Baird, Michal Schneider-Kolsky, Lesley Hewitt, Jenny Sim, Tangerine-Ann Holt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It has been identified that health science student groups may have distinctive learning needs. By university educators' and professional fieldwork supervisors' being aware of the unique learning style preferences of health science students, they have the capacity to adjust their teaching approaches to best fit with their students' learning preferences. The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning style preferences of a group of Australian health science students enrolled in 10 different disciplines.
METHODS: The Kolb Learning Style Inventory was distributed to 2,885 students enrolled in dietetics and nutrition, midwifery, nursing, occupational therapy, paramedics, pharmacy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy, radiography, and social work at one Australian university. A total of 752 usable survey forms were returned (response rate 26%).
RESULTS: The results indicated the converger learning style to be most frequently preferred by health science students and that the diverger and accommodator learning styles were the least preferred.
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that educators take learning style preferences of health science students into consideration when planning, implementing, and evaluating teaching activities, such as including more problem-solving activities that fit within the converger learning style.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20539932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allied Health        ISSN: 0090-7421


  13 in total

1.  Learning styles and teaching perspectives of Canadian pharmacy practice residents and faculty preceptors.

Authors:  Peter S Loewen; Anca Jelescu-Bodos
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The impact of preceptor and student learning styles on experiential performance measures.

Authors:  Janie Robles; Craig D Cox; Charles F Seifert
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Comparison of learning styles of pharmacy students and faculty members.

Authors:  Stephanie Y Crawford; Suhail K Alhreish; Nicholas G Popovich
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Learning style and teaching method preferences of Saudi students of physical therapy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Al Maghraby; Ali M Alshami
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2013-09

5.  The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students.

Authors:  Nursen İlçin; Murat Tomruk; Sevgi Sevi Yeşilyaprak; Didem Karadibak; Sema Savcı
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Learning styles among first professional northern and central India medical students during digitization.

Authors:  Rachna Parashar; Sandip Hulke; Abhijit Pakhare
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-12-20

7.  Does journal club membership improve research evidence uptake in different allied health disciplines: a pre-post study.

Authors:  Lucylynn M Lizarondo; Karen Grimmer-Somers; Saravana Kumar; Alan Crockett
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-10-29

8.  Prerequisites for electronic learning: Iranian postgraduate nursing students' points of view.

Authors:  Alireza Yaghoubi; Farahnaz Abdollahzadeh; Azad Rahmani; Leila Kazemi; Kamyar Ghabili; Samad E J Golzari; Marjan Dehdilani
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-03

9.  The learning type makes the difference - the interrelation of Kolb's learning styles and psychological status of preclinical medical students at the University of Erlangen.

Authors:  Pascal H Burger; Michael Scholz
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2014-11-17

Review 10.  Training programmes to improve evidence uptake and utilisation by physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Jessica Stander; Karen Grimmer; Yolandi Brink
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.