Literature DB >> 20539190

Management and outcome of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty.

Patrick Platzer1, Rupert Schuster, Silke Aldrian, Stella Prosquill, Anna Krumboeck, Isabella Zehetgruber, Florian Kovar, Katrin Schwameis, Vilmos Vécsei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty is continuously rising because of an increasing number of knee joint replacements and an enhanced survivorship of the elderly population after knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to analyze the practicability and effectiveness of the various treatment methods for management of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty, and to determine the clinical and radiographic long-term results of patients following surgical and nonoperative treatment of these injuries.
METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 41 patients (31 women and 10 men; average age, 78.6 years) with periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty between 1992 and 2008. Thirty-seven patients showed a periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur, and four patients had a periprosthetic proximal tibial fracture. Thirty-six patients underwent operative stabilization by plate fixation (n = 18), intramedullary nailing (n = 15) or revision arthroplasty (n = 3), and five patients were treated nonoperatively by long-term cast immobilization.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients returned to their preinjury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. In 10 patients, we saw a relevant decrease of knee function and severe limitations in gait and activities of daily living. Three patients died related to surgery. Successful fracture healing within 6 months was achieved in 33 (87%) of 38 patients. Failures of reduction or fixation occurred in 8 (21%) of 38 patients. Reoperation due to technical failures was necessary in three patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with current data in literature, we had a satisfactory outcome in following individualized treatment of periprosthetic fractures after knee joint replacement. Referring to the wide field of treatment options and high rates of complications, periprosthetic femoral fractures around the knee commonly constitute a challenging problem for the treating surgeons and require an adequate analysis of fracture etiology and a corresponding transfer into an individual treatment concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20539190     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d53f81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  29 in total

1.  A case series of mortality and morbidity in distal femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Toby Jennison; Rathan Yarlagadda
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

2.  Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcus Hofbauer; Gerald E Wozasek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Revision knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral replacement prosthesis for periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Ehab Girgis; Christoph McAllen; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Periprosthetic fractures around the knee: current concepts and advances in management.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Sanchit Mehendale
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 5.  Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Stefano Congia; Roberto Civinini; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25

6.  Stress Fracture of the Lateral Femoral Condyle after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad M Sarzaeem; Mahmood Jabalameli
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-03

7.  Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Quinzi; Gabriel Ramirez; Nathan B Kaplan; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  [Periprosthetic fractures. An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  R Stange; M J Raschke; T Fuchs
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Locked plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Li; Peng Gao; Guixing Qiu; Tao Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the locking and non-locking plating methods.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Tae Yong Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.