Kit N Simpson1. 1. Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA. simpsonk@musc.edu <simpsonk@musc.edu>
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the general literature on microeconomic modeling and key points that must be considered in the general assessment of economic modeling reports, discuss the evolution of HIV economic models and identify models that illustrate this development over time, as well as examples of current studies. Recommend improvements in HIV economic modeling. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent economic modeling studies of HIV include examinations of scaling up antiretroviral (ARV) in South Africa, screening prior to use of abacavir, preexposure prophylaxis, early start of ARV in developing countries and cost-effectiveness comparisons of specific ARV drugs using data from clinical trials. These studies all used extensively published second-generation Markov models in their analyses. There have been attempts to simplify approaches to cost-effectiveness estimates by using simple decision trees or cost-effectiveness calculations with short-time horizons. However, these approaches leave out important cumulative economic effects that will not appear early in a treatment. Many economic modeling studies were identified in the 'gray' literature, but limited descriptions precluded an assessment of their adherence to modeling guidelines, and thus to the validity of their findings. SUMMARY: There is a need for developing third-generation models to accommodate new knowledge about adherence, adverse effects, and viral resistance.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the general literature on microeconomic modeling and key points that must be considered in the general assessment of economic modeling reports, discuss the evolution of HIV economic models and identify models that illustrate this development over time, as well as examples of current studies. Recommend improvements in HIV economic modeling. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent economic modeling studies of HIV include examinations of scaling up antiretroviral (ARV) in South Africa, screening prior to use of abacavir, preexposure prophylaxis, early start of ARV in developing countries and cost-effectiveness comparisons of specific ARV drugs using data from clinical trials. These studies all used extensively published second-generation Markov models in their analyses. There have been attempts to simplify approaches to cost-effectiveness estimates by using simple decision trees or cost-effectiveness calculations with short-time horizons. However, these approaches leave out important cumulative economic effects that will not appear early in a treatment. Many economic modeling studies were identified in the 'gray' literature, but limited descriptions precluded an assessment of their adherence to modeling guidelines, and thus to the validity of their findings. SUMMARY: There is a need for developing third-generation models to accommodate new knowledge about adherence, adverse effects, and viral resistance.
Authors: Sylvie Naar; Michael G Hudgens; Ron Brookmeyer; April Idalski Carcone; Jason Chapman; Shrabanti Chowdhury; Andrea Ciaranello; W Scott Comulada; Samiran Ghosh; Keith J Horvath; LaDrea Ingram; Sara LeGrand; Cathy J Reback; Kit Simpson; Bonita Stanton; Tyrel Starks; Dallas Swendeman Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Anita J Brogan; Erik Smets; Josephine A Mauskopf; Sarah A L Manuel; Ines Adriaenssen Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Kit N Simpson; Pamela P Pei; Jörgen Möller; Robert W Baran; Birgitta Dietz; William Woodward; Kristen Migliaccio-Walle; J Jaime Caro Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.558
Authors: Gabriela B Gomez; Annick Borquez; Kelsey K Case; Ana Wheelock; Anna Vassall; Catherine Hankins Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 11.069