Literature DB >> 20539020

Understanding the lived experiences of patients: application of a phenomenological approach to ethics.

Bruce H Greenfield1, Gail M Jensen.   

Abstract

This perspective article provides a justification, with an overview, of the use of phenomenological inquiry and the interpretation into the everyday ethical concerns of patients with disabilities. Disability is explored as a transformative process that involves physical, cognitive, and moral changes. This perspective article discusses the advantages of phenomenology to supplement and enhance the principlist process of ethical decision making that guides much of contemporary medical practice, including physical therapy. A phenomenological approach provides a more contextual approach to ethical decision making through probing, uncovering, and interpreting the meanings of "stories" of patients. This approach, in turn, provides for a more coherent and genuine application of ethical principles within the "textured life-world" of patients and their evolving values as they grapple with disability to make ethical and clinical decisions. The article begins with an in-depth discussion of the current literature about the phenomenology of people with disability. This literature review is followed by a discussion of the traditional principlist approach to making ethical decisions, which, in turn, is followed by a discussion of phenomenology and its tools for use in clinical inquiry and interpretation of the experiences of patients with disabilities. A specific case is presented that illustrates specific tools of phenomenology to uncover the moral context of disability from the perspective of patients. The article concludes with a discussion of clinical, educational, and research implications of a phenomenological approach to ethics and clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20539020     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  6 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in The Netherlands: a mixed methods overview study.

Authors:  Linda Dauwerse; Froukje Weidema; Tineke Abma; Bert Molewijk; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

2.  Voices of Adults Living with Sickle Cell Disease Pain.

Authors:  Maxine A Adegbola; Donelle M Barnes; Jakki G Opollo; Keela Herr; Jennifer Gray; Ann Marie McCarthy
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2012-12

3.  Individuals' explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Jenny Setchell; Nathalia Costa; Manuela Ferreira; Joanna Makovey; Mandy Nielsen; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience.

Authors:  Gareth Lewis; Melissa McCullough; Alexander P Maxwell; Gerard J Gormley
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-08

5.  What factors are associated with dental general anaesthetics for Australian children and what are the policy implications? A qualitative study.

Authors:  John Rogers; Clare Delany; Clive Wright; Kaye Roberts-Thomson; Mike Morgan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  "A Real Bucket of Worms": Views of People Living with Dementia and Family Members on Supported Decision-Making.

Authors:  Craig Sinclair; Kate Gersbach; Michelle Hogan; Meredith Blake; Romola Bucks; Kirsten Auret; Josephine Clayton; Cameron Stewart; Sue Field; Helen Radoslovich; Meera Agar; Angelita Martini; Meredith Gresham; Kathy Williams; Sue Kurrle
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.