Literature DB >> 20538702

Paramedic diagnosis of stroke: examining long-term use of the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen (MASS) in the field.

Janet E Bray1, Kelly Coughlan, Bill Barger, Chris Bladin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale is ineffectively used and lacks sensitivity and specificity. Melbourne (Australia) paramedics have been using the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen (MASS) since 2005. The aim of this study was to review the real-world use of MASS 3 years after city wide implementation.
METHODS: Two groups of consecutively admitted patients to an Australian hospital between January and May 2008 were used: (1) patients for whom paramedics performed MASS; and (2) patients with a discharge diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Use of MASS was examined for all transports and for patients diagnosed with stroke or transient ischemic attack. The sensitivity and specificity of paramedic diagnosis, MASS, and Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale were calculated. Paramedic diagnosis of stroke among patients with stroke was statistically compared with those obtained immediately post-MASS implementation in 2002.
RESULTS: For the study period, MASS was performed for 850 (16%) of 5286 emergency transports, including 199 of 207 (96%) patients with confirmed stroke and transient ischemic attack. In patients in whom MASS was performed (n=850), the sensitivity of paramedic diagnosis of stroke (93%, 95% CI: 88% to 96%) was higher than the MASS (83%, 95% CI: 77% to 88%, P=0.003) and equivalent to Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (88%, 95% CI: 83% to 92%, P=0.120), whereas the specificity of the paramedic diagnosis of stroke (87%, 95% CI: 84% to 89%) was equivalent to MASS (86%, 95% CI: 83% to 88%, P=0.687) and higher than Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (79%, 95% CI: 75% to 82%, P<0.001). The initial improvement in stroke paramedic diagnosis seen in 2002 (94%, 95% CI: 86% to 98%) was sustained in 2008 (89%, 95% CI: 84% to 94%, P=0.19).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, paramedics have successfully incorporated MASS into the assessment of neurologically compromised patients. The initial improvement to the paramedics' diagnosis of stroke with MASS was sustained 3 years after city wide implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538702     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  13 in total

1.  Prehospital stroke scales as screening tools for early identification of stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Zhivko Zhelev; Greg Walker; Nicholas Henschke; Jonathan Fridhandler; Samuel Yip
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-09

Review 2.  Prehospital stroke scales in urban environments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ethan S Brandler; Mohit Sharma; Richard H Sinert; Steven R Levine
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Patient characteristics affecting stroke identification by emergency medical service providers in Brooklyn, New York.

Authors:  Mohit Sharma; Elizabeth Helzner; Richard Sinert; Steven Richard Levine; Ethan Samuel Brandler
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Validation of the Los Angeles pre-hospital stroke screen (LAPSS) in a Chinese urban emergency medical service population.

Authors:  Shengyun Chen; Haixin Sun; Yanni Lei; Ding Gao; Yan Wang; Yilong Wang; Yong Zhou; Anxin Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Xingquan Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The use of Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale during telephone dispatch interview increases the accuracy in identifying stroke and transient ischemic attack symptoms.

Authors:  Assunta De Luca; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Guido Francesco Villa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Clinical signs in young patients with stroke related to FAST: results of the sifap1 study.

Authors:  Manfred Kaps; Ulrike Grittner; Gerhard Jungehülsing; Turgut Tatlisumak; Christoph Kessler; Reinhold Schmidt; Putaala Jukka; Bo Norrving; Arndt Rolfs; Christian Tanislav
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular accidents: an observational study.

Authors:  Michał Karliński; Marcin Gluszkiewicz; Anna Członkowska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale.

Authors:  Behzad Zohrevandi; Vahid Monsef Kasmaie; Payman Asadi; Hosna Tajik; Nastaran Azizzade Roodpishi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015

9.  Effect of prehospital notification on acute stroke care: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ming-Ju Hsieh; Sung-Chun Tang; Wen-Chu Chiang; Li-Kai Tsai; Jiann-Shing Jeng; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Acute Stroke: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care.

Authors:  Nancy K Glober; Karl A Sporer; Kama Z Guluma; John P Serra; Joe A Barger; John F Brown; Gregory H Gilbert; Kristi L Koenig; Eric M Rudnick; Angelo A Salvucci
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.