Literature DB >> 20538421

Identifying transparency in physician communication.

Lynne Robins1, Saskia Witteborn, Lanae Miner, Larry Mauksch, Kelly Edwards, Douglas Brock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To categorize physician communication demonstrating understanding of what patients want to know and skill in conveying that information. Physicians underestimate how much information patients want and patients rarely seek information during clinic visits. Transparent communication is advocated to facilitate patient understanding and support autonomy, informed decision-making and relationship development.
METHODS: Analysis and coding of 263 audiotaped interactions between 33 primary care physicians and their patients in eight community-based, primary care clinics in Washington State, USA.
RESULTS: Physicians proactively used five types of process transparency to preview speech and actions. Four types of content transparency were used to explicate diagnosis and treatment, demystify medical language and concepts, and interpret biomedical information. Physicians spent the greatest proportion of clinic time explicating medical content.
CONCLUSION: The primacy of information exchange over process-oriented, relational communication was demonstrated. Proactive transparency appears promising to increase understanding and collaboration. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In patient-centered care where collaboration is the ideal, transparency in its various forms is a critical ingredient. Without much communicative effort, physicians who proactively communicated that an examination was over, that they were leaving the exam room briefly so patients could dress provided information that appeared to address patient uncertainty and demonstrated empathy and respect. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538421     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

1.  Empathy and boundary turbulence in cancer communication.

Authors:  Susan H McDaniel; Diane S Morse; Elizabeth A Edwardsen; Adam Taupin; Mary Gale Gurnsey; Jennifer J Griggs; Cleveland G Shields; Shmuel Reis
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  A preliminary mixed-method investigation of trust and hidden signals in medical consultations.

Authors:  Silvia Riva; Marco Monti; Paola Iannello; Gabriella Pravettoni; Peter J Schulz; Alessandro Antonietti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Do emergency department patients receive a pathological diagnosis? A nationally-representative sample.

Authors:  Leana S Wen; Janice A Espinola; Joshua M Kosowsky; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-01-07

Review 4.  Bringing a humanistic approach to cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Roberto Jun Arai; Elaine Santana Longo; Maria Helena Sponton; Maria Del Pilar Estevez Diz
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-05-18

5.  Perceptions of health professionals about the quality of communication and deliberation with the patient and its impact on the health decision making process.

Authors:  Eduardo Osuna; Antonio Pérez-Carrión; María D Pérez-Cárceles; Francisco Machado
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2018-12-20

6.  Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust.

Authors:  Michael Bang Petersen; Alexander Bor; Frederik Jørgensen; Marie Fly Lindholt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.