STUDY OBJECTIVE: Training physicians in new skills through classroom-based teaching has inherent cost and time constraints. We seek to evaluate whether Web-based didactics result in similar knowledge improvement and retention of basic ultrasonographic principles and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST) compared with the traditional method. METHODS:Physicians from 2 German emergency departments were randomized into a classroom group with traditional lectures and a Web group who watched narrated lectures online. All participants completed a pre- and posttest and a second posttest 8 weeks later. Both groups underwent hands-on training after the first posttest. A control group completed the 2 initial tests without didactic intervention. RESULTS:Fifty-five subjects participated in the study. Both the classroom and Web group showed significant improvement in pre- and posttest 1 scores (75.9% versus 93.9% and 77.8% versus 92.5%; P<.001 for both), with similar knowledge retention after 8 weeks (88.6% and 88.9%; P=.87). No statistically significant difference in mean test scores could be found between the 2 groups at each point: -1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.2% to 1.4%) for the pretest, 1.4% (95% CI -0.6% to 3.4%) for posttest 1, and -0.3% (95% CI -3.9% to 3.3%) for posttest 2. The control group showed no learning effect without intervention (83.3% versus 82.8%, ; P=.88). CONCLUSION: Web-based learning provides the potential to teach physicians with greater flexibility than classroom instruction. Our data suggest that Web-based ultrasonography and EFAST didactics are comparable to traditional classroom lectures and result in similar knowledge retention.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Training physicians in new skills through classroom-based teaching has inherent cost and time constraints. We seek to evaluate whether Web-based didactics result in similar knowledge improvement and retention of basic ultrasonographic principles and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST) compared with the traditional method. METHODS: Physicians from 2 German emergency departments were randomized into a classroom group with traditional lectures and a Web group who watched narrated lectures online. All participants completed a pre- and posttest and a second posttest 8 weeks later. Both groups underwent hands-on training after the first posttest. A control group completed the 2 initial tests without didactic intervention. RESULTS: Fifty-five subjects participated in the study. Both the classroom and Web group showed significant improvement in pre- and posttest 1 scores (75.9% versus 93.9% and 77.8% versus 92.5%; P<.001 for both), with similar knowledge retention after 8 weeks (88.6% and 88.9%; P=.87). No statistically significant difference in mean test scores could be found between the 2 groups at each point: -1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.2% to 1.4%) for the pretest, 1.4% (95% CI -0.6% to 3.4%) for posttest 1, and -0.3% (95% CI -3.9% to 3.3%) for posttest 2. The control group showed no learning effect without intervention (83.3% versus 82.8%, ; P=.88). CONCLUSION: Web-based learning provides the potential to teach physicians with greater flexibility than classroom instruction. Our data suggest that Web-based ultrasonography and EFAST didactics are comparable to traditional classroom lectures and result in similar knowledge retention.
Authors: Carmina Guitart; Esther Esteban; Judit Becerra; Javier Rodríguez-Fanjul; Francisco José Cambra; Mònica Balaguer; Iolanda Jordan Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Stephen C Haskins; Daniel Feldman; Kara G Fields; Meghan A Kirksey; Cynthia A Lien; Thuyvan H Luu; Jemiel A Nejim; James A Osorio; Elaine I Yang Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2018-07-01
Authors: Tarina Lee Kang; Kristin Berona; Marsha A Elkhunovich; Roberto Medero-Colon; Dina Seif; Mikaela L Chilstrom; Tom Mailhot Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2015-03-13
Authors: Colleen Cuca; Patrick Scheiermann; Dorothea Hempel; Gabriele Via; Armin Seibel; Magnus Barth; Tim O Hirche; Felix Walcher; Raoul Breitkreutz Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 1.112