Susan E Hardy1, Stephanie A Studenski. 1. Division of Geriatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. hardys@dom.pitt.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although fatigue is a common and distressing symptom, a well-specified definition of fatigue is lacking. One of the least well-defined aspects of fatigue is its quality, which might reflect the underlying pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE: To identify the qualities of fatigue and assess whether they are associated with distinct chronic conditions. METHODS: We identified five fatigue qualities in the literature, two mental and three physical, and selected representative items from those available in our data from a prospective cohort of 495 community-dwelling primary care patients aged 65 years or older. We then examined the prevalence of each quality, the correlations among qualities, and the association of fatigue qualities with health and functional status, including chronic conditions. RESULTS: Fatigue was very common among older primary care patients, with 70% reporting one or more fatigue qualities and 43% reporting feeling tired most of the time, and was associated with worse health and functional status. Physical fatigue qualities were more common than mental qualities. Correlations among fatigue qualities were 0.09-0.27 and did not support the mental vs. physical classification. Different fatigue qualities were not well explained by older adults' underlying chronic conditions. Rather, the cumulative number of fatigue qualities was associated with worse health and function. CONCLUSION: These first steps in exploring fatigue qualities suggest that different fatigue qualities could represent disparate manifestations of a common underlying etiology, while not ruling out distinct underlying pathophysiologies. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CONTEXT: Although fatigue is a common and distressing symptom, a well-specified definition of fatigue is lacking. One of the least well-defined aspects of fatigue is its quality, which might reflect the underlying pathophysiology. OBJECTIVE: To identify the qualities of fatigue and assess whether they are associated with distinct chronic conditions. METHODS: We identified five fatigue qualities in the literature, two mental and three physical, and selected representative items from those available in our data from a prospective cohort of 495 community-dwelling primary care patients aged 65 years or older. We then examined the prevalence of each quality, the correlations among qualities, and the association of fatigue qualities with health and functional status, including chronic conditions. RESULTS:Fatigue was very common among older primary care patients, with 70% reporting one or more fatigue qualities and 43% reporting feeling tired most of the time, and was associated with worse health and functional status. Physical fatigue qualities were more common than mental qualities. Correlations among fatigue qualities were 0.09-0.27 and did not support the mental vs. physical classification. Different fatigue qualities were not well explained by older adults' underlying chronic conditions. Rather, the cumulative number of fatigue qualities was associated with worse health and function. CONCLUSION: These first steps in exploring fatigue qualities suggest that different fatigue qualities could represent disparate manifestations of a common underlying etiology, while not ruling out distinct underlying pathophysiologies. Copyright 2010 U.S. CancerPain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Ashok Poluri; John Mores; Dane B Cook; Thomas W Findley; Adrian Cristian Journal: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 1.784
Authors: Subashan Perera; Stephanie Studenski; Julie M Chandler; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jeremy Walston; Evan C Hadley; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski; William B Ershler; Tamara Harris; Linda P Fried Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ivan Bautmans; Rose Njemini; Margareta Lambert; Christian Demanet; Tony Mets Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Paulo H M Chaves; Richard D Semba; Sean X Leng; Richard C Woodman; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Linda P Fried Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Stefania S Grigoriou; Argyro A Krase; Christina Karatzaferi; Christoforos D Giannaki; Eleftherios Lavdas; Georgia I Mitrou; Saul Bloxham; Ioannis Stefanidis; Giorgos K Sakkas Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Erica Weitzner; Donna McKenna; John Nowakowski; Carol Scavarda; Rhea Dornbush; Susan Bittker; Denise Cooper; Robert B Nadelman; Paul Visintainer; Ira Schwartz; Gary P Wormser Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Joshua Hyong-Jin Cho; Richard Olmstead; Hanbyul Choi; Carmen Carrillo; Teresa E Seeman; Michael R Irwin Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Leorey N Saligan; David A Luckenbaugh; Elizabeth E Slonena; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Carlos A Zarate Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 4.791