Literature DB >> 20538166

Clinical predictors of plaque progression despite very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Ozgur Bayturan1, Samir Kapadia, Stephen J Nicholls, E Murat Tuzcu, Mingyuan Shao, Kiyoko Uno, Ajai Shreevatsa, Andrea J Lavoie, Kathy Wolski, Paul Schoenhagen, Steven E Nissen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the determinants of plaque progression despite achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).
BACKGROUND: Despite achieving very low levels of LDL-C, many patients continue to demonstrate disease progression and have clinical events.
METHODS: A total of 3,437 patients with coronary artery disease underwent serial intravascular ultrasound examination in 7 clinical trials. Patients who achieved an on-treatment LDL-C level of <or=70 mg/dl (n = 951) were stratified as progressors (n = 200) and nonprogressors (n = 751) and compared.
RESULTS: Despite achieving LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl, >20% of patients continued to progress. There were no demographic differences between groups. Progressors demonstrated higher baseline levels of glucose (117.1 +/- 42.5 mg/dl vs. 112.1 +/- 40.0 mg/dl, p = 0.02), triglycerides (157.5 mg/dl vs. 133.0 mg/dl, p = 0.004), and a smaller decrease of apolipoprotein B (-25.1 +/- 3.4 mg/dl vs. -27.4 +/- 3.35 mg/dl, p = 0.01) at follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that independently associated risk factors of progression in patients with LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl included baseline percent atheroma volume (p = 0.001), presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02), increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), less increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.01), and a smaller decrease in apolipoprotein B levels (p = 0.001), but not changes in C-reactive protein (p = 0.78) or LDL-C (p = 0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Residual risk factors are associated with the likelihood of disease progression in patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels. In addition, the association between apolipoprotein B and atheroma progression highlights the potential importance of LDL particle concentration in patients with optimal LDL-C control. This finding highlights the need for intensive modification of global risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538166     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  38 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention: the significance of native coronary artery disease progression.

Authors:  Athanasios Moulias; Dimitrios Alexopoulos
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  [Progression and regression of atherosclerotic plaques. New results based on intracoronary ultrasound].

Authors:  Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Differential metabolic actions of specific statins: clinical and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Soo Lim; Ichiro Sakuma; Michael J Quon; Kwang Kon Koh
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  A predictor of atheroma progression in patients achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nozue; Shingo Yamamoto; Shinichi Tohyama; Kazuki Fukui; Shigeo Umezawa; Yuko Onishi; Tomoyuki Kunishima; Kiyoshi Hibi; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Ichiro Michishita
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-11-01

Review 5.  Molecular sources of residual cardiovascular risk, clinical signals, and innovative solutions: relationship with subclinical disease, undertreatment, and poor adherence: implications of new evidence upon optimizing cardiovascular patient outcomes.

Authors:  Richard Kones
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-10-21

6.  Epicardial adipose tissue is associated with high-risk plaque feature progression in non-culprit lesions.

Authors:  Yahang Tan; Jia Zhou; Ying Zhou; Xiaobo Yang; Jing Wang; Yundai Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017.

Authors:  Makoto Kinoshita; Koutaro Yokote; Hidenori Arai; Mami Iida; Yasushi Ishigaki; Shun Ishibashi; Seiji Umemoto; Genshi Egusa; Hirotoshi Ohmura; Tomonori Okamura; Shinji Kihara; Shinji Koba; Isao Saito; Tetsuo Shoji; Hiroyuki Daida; Kazuhisa Tsukamoto; Juno Deguchi; Seitaro Dohi; Kazushige Dobashi; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi; Masumi Hara; Takafumi Hiro; Sadatoshi Biro; Yoshio Fujioka; Chizuko Maruyama; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Masayuki Yokode; Hiroshi Yoshida; Hiromi Rakugi; Akihiko Wakatsuki; Shizuya Yamashita
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.928

Review 8.  Secondary Stroke Prevention: Improving Diagnosis and Management with Newer Technologies.

Authors:  Yahia Z Imam; Atlantic D'Souza; Rayaz A Malik; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 9.  The "New Deadly Quartet" for cardiovascular disease in the 21st century: obesity, metabolic syndrome, inflammation and climate change: how does statin therapy fit into this equation?

Authors:  Michael Clearfield; Melissa Pearce; Yasmin Nibbe; David Crotty; Alesia Wagner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Regression of coronary atherosclerosis with infusions of the high-density lipoprotein mimetic CER-001 in patients with more extensive plaque burden.

Authors:  Yu Kataoka; Jordan Andrews; MyNgan Duong; Tracy Nguyen; Nisha Schwarz; Jessica Fendler; Rishi Puri; Julie Butters; Constance Keyserling; John F Paolini; Jean-Louis Dasseux; Stephen J Nicholls
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.