Literature DB >> 20537948

Effect of genome-wide association studies, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and high-speed sequencing technologies on predictive genetic counselling for cancer risk.

Michael R Speicher1, Jochen B Geigl, Ian P Tomlinson.   

Abstract

Genetic counselling is offered to patients with various hereditary cancers. At-risk family members can be identified by predictive testing and included in specifically designed screening and prevention programmes. Since genetic testing has far-reaching ethical and medical outcomes, it is usually done according to well-defined guidelines developed by medical societies, entailing extensive interaction between family members and medical health providers. This established procedure is now changing after three new developments. First, data from genome-wide association studies have identified many new loci in the human genome, which could moderately change cancer risk. Second, although inclusion of low-risk cancer genes in patients' risk assessments represents an unresolved challenge, several companies already offer such tests in a direct-to-consumer format over the internet. These tests shift control of genetic testing from medical professionals to individuals. Third, development of high-speed sequencing technologies multiplies available genomic data and enables rapid sequencing of entire human genomes at low costs. This innovation will pave the way for personalised genetics and new options for predictive testing. Here, we use the example of genetic counselling in colon cancer to describe how these developments will change genetic testing in families at risk of cancer and in the general population.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537948     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70359-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  12 in total

Review 1.  Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: pathobiology and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  H Sill; W Olipitz; A Zebisch; E Schulz; A Wölfler
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Heather Niven; Alison Rutstein; Louisa Flander; Clara Gaff; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-14

3.  On the readiness of physicians for pharmacogenomics testing: an empirical assessment.

Authors:  N Amara; J Blouin-Bougie; D Bouthillier; J Simard
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  Genetics patients' perspectives on clinical genomic testing.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Allison Glinka; Janelle Highland; George Asaad; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Life insurance: genomic stratification and risk classification.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Hilary Burton; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Ida Ngueng Feze; Tom Dent; Nora Pashayan; Susmita Chowdhury; William Foulkes; Alison Hall; Pavel Hamet; Nick Kirwan; Angus Macdonald; Jacques Simard; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Gatekeeper role of gastroenterologists and surgeons in recognising and discussing familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten F L Douma; Evelien Dekker; Ellen M A Smets; Cora M Aalfs
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Genetic variation and its role in malignancy.

Authors:  Bente A Talseth-Palmer; Rodney J Scott
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-09

Review 8.  Use of next generation sequencing technologies in research and beyond: are participants with mental health disorders fully protected?

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Ghislaine Mathieu; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Multiplex genetic cancer testing identifies pathogenic mutations in TP53 and CDH1 in a patient with bilateral breast and endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ellen Heitzer; Sigurd Lax; Ingrid Lafer; Stephanie M Müller; Gunda Pristauz; Peter Ulz; Stephan Jahn; Christoph Högenauer; Edgar Petru; Michael R Speicher; Jochen B Geigl
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Stephan Pabinger; Andreas Dander; Maria Fischer; Rene Snajder; Michael Sperk; Mirjana Efremova; Birgit Krabichler; Michael R Speicher; Johannes Zschocke; Zlatko Trajanoski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 11.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.