Literature DB >> 20536805

Do California counties with lower socioeconomic levels have less access to emergency department care?

Deepa Ravikumar1, Renee Hsia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to examine the relationship between number of emergency departments (EDs) per capita in California counties and measures of socioeconomic status, to determine whether individuals living in areas with lower socioeconomic levels have decreased access to emergency care.
METHODS: The authors linked 2005 data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey of Hospitals with the Area Resource Files from the United States Department of Health and Human Services and performed Poisson regression analyses of the association between EDs per capita in individual California counties using the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) county codes and three measures of socioeconomic status: median household income, percentage uninsured, and years of education for individuals over 25 years of age. Multivariate analyses using Poisson regression were also performed to determine if any of these measures of socioeconomic status were independently associated with access to EDs.
RESULTS: Median household income is inversely related to the number of EDs per capita (rate ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71 to 0.96). Controlling for income in the multivariate analysis demonstrates that there are more EDs per 100,000 population in FIPS codes with more insured residents when compared with areas having less insured residents with the same levels of household income. Similarly, FIPS codes whose residents have more education have more EDs per 100,000 compared with areas with the same income level whose residents have less education.
CONCLUSIONS: Counties whose residents are poorer have more EDs per 100,000 residents than those with higher median household incomes. However, for the same income level, counties with more insured and more highly educated residents have a greater number of EDs per capita than those with less insured and less educated residents. These findings warrant in-depth studies on disparities in access to care as they relate to socioeconomic status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20536805      PMCID: PMC3121689          DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00734.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  10 in total

1.  The emergency department: rethinking the safety net for the safety net.

Authors:  Bruce Siegel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Emergency department capacity and access in California, 1990-2001: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Glenn A Melnick; Amar C Nawathe; Anil Bamezai; Lois Green
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Emergency care in California: robust capacity or busted access?

Authors:  W Wesley Fields
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Staffing, capacity, and ambulance diversion in emergency departments: United States, 2003-04.

Authors:  Catharine W Burt; Linda F McCaig
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2006-09-27

5.  The emergency department for routine healthcare: race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and perceptual factors.

Authors:  Rick Hong; Brigitte M Baumann; Edwin D Boudreaux
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Determinants of emergency department use: are race and ethnicity important?

Authors:  D W Baker; C D Stevens; R H Brook
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Trends in the use and capacity of California's emergency departments, 1990-1999.

Authors:  Susan Lambe; Donna L Washington; Arlene Fink; Katherine Herbst; Honghu Liu; Jessica Scura Fosse; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Distances to emergency department and to primary care provider's office affect emergency department use in children.

Authors:  Annameika Ludwick; Rongwei Fu; Craig Warden; Robert A Lowe
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Utilization of the emergency room: impact of geographic distance.

Authors:  Jae Eun Lee; Jung Hye Sung; William B Ward; Peter J Fos; Won Jae Lee; Jae Chang Kim
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.212

10.  Characteristics of emergency departments serving high volumes of safety-net patients: United States, 2000.

Authors:  Catharine W Burt; Irma E Arispe
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  2004-05
  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  A research agenda to assure equity during periods of emergency department crowding.

Authors:  Ula Hwang; Ellen J Weber; Lynne D Richardson; Vicki Sweet; Knox Todd; Gallane Abraham; Felix Ankel
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  System-level health disparities in California emergency departments: minorities and Medicaid patients are at higher risk of losing their emergency departments.

Authors:  Renee Y Hsia; Tanja Srebotnjak; Hemal K Kanzaria; Charles McCulloch; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Physician-led team triage based on lean principles may be superior for efficiency and quality? A comparison of three emergency departments with different triage models.

Authors:  Lena Burström; Martin Nordberg; Göran Ornung; Maaret Castrén; Tony Wiklund; Marie-Louise Engström; Mats Enlund
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.