Literature DB >> 20536477

Increased sensitivity of patch testing by standardized tape stripping beforehand: a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

Heinrich Dickel1, Burkhard Kreft, Oliver Kuss, Margitta Worm, Stephanie Soost, Jochen Brasch, Wolfgang Pfützner, Jürgen Grabbe, Irena Angelova-Fischer, Peter Elsner, Joachim Fluhr, Peter Altmeyer, Johannes Geier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a modification of patch testing, the strip patch test was established to obtain more sensitive and reliable test results. Comparative data on diagnostic accuracy for both tests are missing.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of strip patch tests and patch tests in detecting sensitizations in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis by using patient history as the reference standard. PATIENTS/
METHODS: In a multicentre, prospective, investigator-blinded study 790 patients were enrolled. The defined reference standard was established prior to patch testing. Patch tests were performed with nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate, and lanolin alcohol. Duplicate tests were simultaneously performed on both sides of the back, of which one randomly chosen side was tape stripped beforehand, according to a standardized procedure. Primary outcome was the difference in sensitivity between strip patch test and patch test.
RESULTS: Seven hundred and eighty-seven patients were included in the analysis. Strip patch tests detected considerably more sensitization to nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate than patch tests: differences of sensitivities were 16.4% (95% CI, 8.7-24.1%) for nickel sulfate and 25.0% (95% CI, 8.9-41.0%) for potassium dichromate, both favouring the strip patch test.
CONCLUSIONS: The standardized strip patch test proved to be accurate and clinically safe and is promising to improve diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis beyond the patch test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20536477     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01710.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  9 in total

1.  [Positive strip patch test reactions with coexistent negative patch test reactions. Relevance for the assessment practice of occupational skin disease].

Authors:  N Scola; N Hunzelmann; T Ruzicka; S Kobus; E Adamek; P Altmeyer; H Dickel
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  [Diagnostics of drug hypersensitivity reactions].

Authors:  C Möbs; W Pfützner
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  New routes for allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Pål Johansen; Seraina von Moos; Deepa Mohanan; Thomas M Kündig; Gabriela Senti
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  [Diagnosis of contact allergy in practice using current guidelines].

Authors:  H Dickel; V Mahler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 5.  Guideline contact dermatitis: S1-Guidelines of the German Contact Allergy Group (DKG) of the German Dermatology Society (DDG), the Information Network of Dermatological Clinics (IVDK), the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Working Group for Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (ABD) of the DDG, the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD) and the DDG.

Authors:  Jochen Brasch; Detlef Becker; Werner Aberer; Andreas Bircher; Birger Kränke; Kirsten Jung; Bernhard Przybilla; Tilo Biedermann; Thomas Werfel; Swen Malte John; Peter Elsner; Thomas Diepgen; Axel Trautmann; Hans F Merk; Thomas Fuchs; Axel Schnuch
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2014

6.  International survey on skin patch test procedures, attitudes and interpretation.

Authors:  Luciana K Tanno; Razvigor Darlenski; Silvia Sánchez-Garcia; Matteo Bonini; Andrea Vereda; Pavel Kolkhir; Dario Antolin-Amerigo; Vesselin Dimov; Claudia Gallego-Corella; Juan Carlos Aldave Becerra; Alexander Diaz; Virginia Bellido Linares; Leonor Villa; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Ignacio Ansotegui; Ruby Pawankar; Thomas Bieber
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.084

7.  Alternative Confidence Interval Methods Used in the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Semra Erdoğan; Orekıcı Temel Gülhan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Civil construction work: The unseen contributor to the occupational and global disease burden.

Authors:  R Sitalakshmi; P Saikumar; P Jeyachandran; Jayakar Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016 May-Aug

9.  Aeroallergen patch testing in patients of suspected contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Nelee Bisen; Shrutakirthi D Shenoi; C Balachandran
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.494

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.