Literature DB >> 20535763

Pattern-mixture models for analyzing normal outcome data with proxy respondents.

Michelle Shardell1, Gregory E Hicks, Ram R Miller, Patricia Langenberg, Jay Magaziner.   

Abstract

Studies of older adults often involve interview questions regarding subjective constructs such as perceived disability. In some studies, when subjects are unable (e.g. due to cognitive impairment) or unwilling to respond to these questions, proxies (e.g. relatives or other care givers) are recruited to provide responses in place of the subject. Proxies are usually not approached to respond on behalf of subjects who respond for themselves; thus, for each subject, data from only one of the subject or proxy are available. Typically, proxy responses are simply substituted for missing subject responses, and standard complete-data analyses are performed. However, this approach may introduce measurement error and produce biased parameter estimates. In this paper, we propose using pattern-mixture models that relate non-identifiable parameters to identifiable parameters to analyze data with proxy respondents. We posit three interpretable pattern-mixture restrictions to be used with proxy data, and we propose estimation procedures using maximum likelihood and multiple imputation. The methods are applied to a cohort of elderly hip-fracture patients. (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535763      PMCID: PMC3010385          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  16 in total

1.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  The role of proxy information in missing data analysis.

Authors:  Rong Huang; Yuanyuan Liang; K C Carrière
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Gender differences in functioning after hip fracture.

Authors:  William G Hawkes; Lois Wehren; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.

Authors:  C Y Wang; Yijian Huang; Edward C Chao; Marjorie K Jeffcoat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates.

Authors:  R J Little; Y Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria.

Authors:  R L Prentice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance.

Authors:  J Magaziner; S I Zimmerman; A L Gruber-Baldini; J R Hebel; K M Fox
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations.

Authors:  A Lynn Snow; Karon F Cook; Pay-Shin Lin; Robert O Morgan; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older.

Authors:  J Magaziner; S S Bassett; J R Hebel; A Gruber-Baldini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  The use of proxy respondents in studies of older adults: lessons, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  P J Neumann; S S Araki; E M Gutterman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing reports from hip-fracture patients and their proxies: implications on evaluating sex differences in disability and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Dawn E Alley; Ram R Miller; Gregory E Hicks; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2011-12-29

2.  Measurement error correction and sensitivity analysis in longitudinal dietary intervention studies using an external validation study.

Authors:  Juned Siddique; Michael J Daniels; Raymond J Carroll; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Elizabeth A Stuart; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Statistical analysis with missing exposure data measured by proxy respondents: a misclassification problem within a missing-data problem.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Sensitivity analysis for nonignorable missingness and outcome misclassification from proxy reports.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Eleanor M Simonsick; Gregory E Hicks; Barbara Resnick; Luigi Ferrucci; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.