Literature DB >> 20535051

Treatment expectations and preferences as predictors of outcome of acupuncture for chronic back pain.

Karen J Sherman1, Daniel C Cherkin, Laura Ichikawa, Andrew L Avins, Kristin Delaney, William E Barlow, Partap S Khalsa, Richard A Deyo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Preplanned secondary analysis of data from participants receiving acupuncture in a randomized clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients' expectations of and preferences for acupuncture predict short and long-term treatment outcomes for persons with chronic back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although accumulating evidence suggests that patient expectations and treatment preferences may predict treatment outcomes, few studies have examined this relationship for acupuncture.
METHODS: Four hundred seventy-seven acupuncture-naïve participants with chronic low back pain who were randomized to 1 of 3 acupuncture or simulated acupuncture treatments were the focus of this analysis. Ten treatments were provided during a 7-week period, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. Before randomization, participants provided expectations regarding treatment success, impressions, and knowledge about acupuncture and treatment preferences. Outcomes of interest were functional status (Roland score) and symptom bothersomeness at 8 and 52 weeks postrandomization, obtained by telephone interviewers masked to treatment assignment.
RESULTS: Persons with high pretreatment expectations for the success of acupuncture were more likely to report greater general expectations for improvement, a preference for acupuncture, having heard acupuncture was a very effective treatment and having a very or moderately positive impression of acupuncture. However, none of these variables was a significant predictor of improvement in back-related symptoms or function at 8 or 52 weeks. After 1 treatment, participants' revised expectations of treatment success were only associated with back-symptoms at the end of treatment. After 5 treatments, revised expectation of success was predictive of both symptoms and function at 8 and 52 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment expectations and preferences for acupuncture were not found predictive of treatment outcomes for patients with chronic back pain. These results differ from previous studies evaluating acupuncture for chronic back pain. These inconsistent results suggest that the relationship between expectations and outcomes may be more complex than previously believed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535051      PMCID: PMC2895682          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c2a8d3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Placebo-associated blood pressure response and adverse effects in the treatment of hypertension: observations from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

Authors:  R A Preston; B J Materson; D J Reda; D W Williams
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-22

Review 2.  The placebo effect in alternative medicine: can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance?

Authors:  Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Acupuncture--a critical analysis.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  What do you expect from this treatment? Changing our mind about clinical trials.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences.

Authors:  J K Moffett; D Torgerson; S Bell-Syer; D Jackson; H Llewlyn-Phillips; A Farrin; J Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

6.  Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Z Di Blasi; E Harkness; E Ernst; A Georgiou; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Are patient expectations still relevant for psychotherapy process and outcome?

Authors:  Roger P Greenberg; Michael J Constantino; Noah Bruce
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10

8.  Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects.

Authors:  D Kalauokalani; D C Cherkin; K J Sherman; T D Koepsell; R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Evaluation of acupuncture for pain control after oral surgery: a placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  L Lao; S Bergman; G R Hamilton; P Langenberg; B Berman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-05

10.  Classification of low back pain in primary care: using "bothersomeness" to identify the most severe cases.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  39 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Why not everyone with low back pain chooses chiropractic care.

Authors:  Simon Dagenais
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2013-03

Review 3.  The physiological basis of complementary and alternative medicines for polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Nazia Raja-Khan; Elisabet Stener-Victorin; XiaoKe Wu; Richard S Legro
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 4.  Expanding Targets for Intervention in Later Life Pain: What Role Can Patient Beliefs, Expectations, and Pleasant Activities Play?

Authors:  M Carrington Reid
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.076

5.  The Trials and Tribulations of Selecting Comparison Groups in Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacological Complementary and Integrative Health Interventions.

Authors:  Karen J Sherman
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.579

6.  Expectancy in real and sham electroacupuncture: does believing make it so?

Authors:  Joshua Bauml; Sharon X Xie; John T Farrar; Marjorie A Bowman; Susan Q Li; Deborah Bruner; Angela DeMichele; Jun J Mao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2014-11

7.  The effects of old, new and emerging medicines on metabolic aberrations in PCOS.

Authors:  Alexandra Bargiota; Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 8.  Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimittri Delevry; Quang A Le
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Differences in the quality of interpersonal care in complementary and conventional medicine.

Authors:  André Busato; Beat Künzi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.659

10.  Modes of hoping: understanding hope and expectation in the context of a clinical trial of complementary and alternative medicine for chronic pain.

Authors:  Emery R Eaves; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mark Nichter; Allison L Hopkins; Karen J Sherman
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 1.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.