Literature DB >> 20535050

Outcome of spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a cross-sectional study in Korea.

Chang-Bae Kong1, Do-Whan Jeon, Bong-Soon Chang, Jae Hyup Lee, Kyung-Soo Suk, Jong-Beom Park.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of postoperative pain and patients' satisfaction after lumbar fusion from a nationwide survey in Korea. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been few studies that investigated the factors related to patients' satisfaction after spinal fusion in lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).
METHODS: This study included 629 patients who underwent spinal fusion for LDD at clinics of designated members of the Korean Society of Spine Surgery. This survey was done in 123 hospitals with 171 spine surgeons. Questionnaires for patients included severity of present back pain and radicular pain (visual analog scale score), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and subjective outcomes. Questionnaire for surgeons included preoperative diagnosis, level of fusion, operative method, and presumed patient's pain.
RESULTS: The patients were 199 men and 430 women, with mean age of 62.3 years. The mean visual analog scale score of back pain and radicular pain was 5.0 +/- 2.6 and 4.4 +/- 3.0, respectively. The mean ODI was 44.3 +/- 19.4. ODI was significantly increased with older age, workers' compensation, and increased fusion extent. Correlated factors of dissatisfaction were severe back pain, higher ODI, multiple operation, and insufficient explanation about postoperative pain. There was a significant correlation between preoperative explanation about postoperative pain and degree of patient's pain.
CONCLUSION: Patients' satisfaction was not as high as expected after fusion for LDD. Therefore, the decision for performing a lumbar fusion in those patients must be done more carefully, and it should be explained more precisely that chronic pain may persist after spinal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535050     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c49fd0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: a prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Katrin Stosch-Wiechert; Franziska Heider; Phat Amnajtrakul; Alexander Krenauer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in spine surgery.

Authors:  Tungish Bansal; Alok D Sharan; Bhavuk Garg
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 3.  Effectiveness of educational videos on patient's preparation for diagnostic procedures: Systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ana Monteiro Grilo; Ana Catarina Ferreira; Marta Pedro Ramos; Elisabete Carolino; Ana Filipa Pires; Lina Vieira
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Patient Information Leaflets for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Missed Opportunity.

Authors:  Matthew Low; Louise C Burgess; Thomas W Wainwright
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2019-12-26

Review 5.  Development, Pathogenesis, and Regeneration of the Intervertebral Disc: Current and Future Insights Spanning Traditional to Omics Methods.

Authors:  Tara T Hickman; Sudiksha Rathan-Kumar; Sun H Peck
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-11

6.  Clinical and radiological mid- to long-term investigation of anterior lumbar stand-alone fusion: Incidence of reoperation and adjacent segment degeneration.

Authors:  Katrin Stosch-Wiechert; Karin Wuertz-Kozak; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph J Siepe
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-08-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.