Literature DB >> 20534436

Ligand-directed c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation disrupts opioid receptor signaling.

Erica J Melief1, Mayumi Miyatake, Michael R Bruchas, Charles Chavkin.   

Abstract

Ligand-directed signaling has been suggested as a basis for the differences in responses evoked by otherwise receptor-selective agonists. The underlying mechanisms are not understood, yet clearer definition of this concept may be helpful in the development of novel, pathway-selective therapeutic agents. We previously showed that kappa-opioid receptor activation of JNK by one class of ligand, but not another, caused persistent receptor inactivation. In the current study, we found that the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) could be similarly inactivated by a specific ligand class including the prototypical opioid, morphine. Acute analgesic tolerance to morphine and related opioids (morphine-6-glucuronide and buprenorphine) was blocked by JNK inhibition, but not by G protein receptor kinase 3 knockout. In contrast, a second class of mu-opioids including fentanyl, methadone, and oxycodone produced acute analgesic tolerance that was blocked by G protein receptor kinase 3 knockout, but not by JNK inhibition. Acute MOR desensitization, demonstrated by reduced D-Ala(2)-Met(5)-Glyol-enkephalin-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to spinal cord membranes from morphine-pretreated mice, was also blocked by JNK inhibition; however, desensitization of D-Ala(2)-Met(5)-Glyol-enkephalin-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding following fentanyl pretreatment was not blocked by JNK inhibition. JNK-mediated receptor inactivation of the kappa-opioid receptor was evident in both agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and opioid analgesic assays; however, gene knockout of JNK 1 selectively blocked kappa-receptor inactivation, whereas deletion of JNK 2 selectively blocked MOR inactivation. These findings suggest that ligand-directed activation of JNK kinases may generally provides an alternate mode of G protein-coupled receptor regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20534436      PMCID: PMC2895055          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000751107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  Ligand-induced changes in surface mu-opioid receptor number: relationship to G protein activation?

Authors:  P A Zaki; D E Keith; G A Brine; F I Carroll; C J Evans
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  mu-Opioid receptors desensitize less rapidly than delta-opioid receptors due to less efficient activation of arrestin.

Authors:  Janet D Lowe; Jeremy P Celver; Vsevolod V Gurevich; Charles Chavkin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog.

Authors:  W R Martin; C G Eades; J A Thompson; R E Huppler; P E Gilbert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Opioid agonists have different efficacy profiles for G protein activation, rapid desensitization, and endocytosis of mu-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Stephanie L Borgland; Mark Connor; Peregrine B Osborne; John B Furness; MacDonald J Christie
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Effect of the A118G polymorphism on binding affinity, potency and agonist-mediated endocytosis, desensitization, and resensitization of the human mu-opioid receptor.

Authors:  Andrea Beyer; Thomas Koch; Helmut Schröder; Stefan Schulz; Volker Höllt
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  The effect of protein kinase C and G protein-coupled receptor kinase inhibition on tolerance induced by mu-opioid agonists of different efficacy.

Authors:  L C Hull; J Llorente; B H Gabra; F L Smith; E Kelly; C Bailey; G Henderson; W L Dewey
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  G-protein receptor kinase 3 (GRK3) influences opioid analgesic tolerance but not opioid withdrawal.

Authors:  Gregory W Terman; Wenzhen Jin; Young-Pyo Cheong; Janet Lowe; Marc G Caron; Robert J Lefkowitz; Charles Chavkin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Distinct domains of the mu-opioid receptor control uncoupling and internalization.

Authors:  Jeremy Celver; Mei Xu; Wenzhen Jin; Janet Lowe; Charles Chavkin
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase is distinctively required for mu-, but not kappa-opioid receptor-induced activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase.

Authors:  Angel Y F Kam; Anthony S L Chan; Yung H Wong
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  Ligand-induced mu opioid receptor endocytosis and recycling in enteric neurons.

Authors:  J G Minnis; S Patierno; S E Kohlmeier; N C Brecha; M Tonini; C Sternini
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  82 in total

1.  Chronic psychostimulant exposure to adult, but not periadolescent rats reduces subsequent morphine antinociception.

Authors:  Michelle C Cyr; Susan L Ingram; Sue A Aicher; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 2.  Ligand-directed signalling within the opioid receptor family.

Authors:  Amynah A Pradhan; Monique L Smith; Brigitte L Kieffer; Christopher J Evans
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  The therapeutic potential of κ-opioids for treatment of pain and addiction.

Authors:  Charles Chavkin
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Duration of action of a broad range of selective κ-opioid receptor antagonists is positively correlated with c-Jun N-terminal kinase-1 activation.

Authors:  Erica J Melief; Mayumi Miyatake; F Ivy Carroll; Cécile Béguin; William A Carlezon; Bruce M Cohen; Sarah Grimwood; Charles H Mitch; Linda Rorick-Kehn; Charles Chavkin
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Stress-induced activation of the dynorphin/κ-opioid receptor system in the amygdala potentiates nicotine conditioned place preference.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Smith; Abigail G Schindler; Emma Martinelli; Richard M Gustin; Michael R Bruchas; Charles Chavkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Opiate agonist-induced re-distribution of Wntless, a mu-opioid receptor interacting protein, in rat striatal neurons.

Authors:  B A S Reyes; K Vakharia; T N Ferraro; R Levenson; W H Berrettini; E J Van Bockstaele
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 7.  Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance.

Authors:  John T Williams; Susan L Ingram; Graeme Henderson; Charles Chavkin; Mark von Zastrow; Stefan Schulz; Thomas Koch; Christopher J Evans; Macdonald J Christie
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 8.  Targeting opioid dysregulation in depression for the development of novel therapeutics.

Authors:  Caroline A Browne; Irwin Lucki
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 9.  Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor Structure, Signaling, Ligands, Functions, and Interactions with Opioid Systems.

Authors:  Lawrence Toll; Michael R Bruchas; Girolamo Calo'; Brian M Cox; Nurulain T Zaveri
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 25.468

10.  Ligand-biased activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 leads to differences in opioid induced antinociception and tolerance.

Authors:  Erin N Bobeck; Susan L Ingram; Sam M Hermes; Sue A Aicher; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.