Literature DB >> 20534334

The effects of critical care outreach services before and after critical care: a matched-cohort analysis.

David A Harrison1, Haiyan Gao, Catherine A Welch, Kathryn M Rowan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of visits from critical care outreach services (CCOS) before admission to and following discharge from critical care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study was performed in 52 acute hospitals in England. A total of 23 234 patients received CCOS visits; 10 404 (45%) were admitted to a critical care unit, and 7078 (68%) were included in the analysis. Patients receiving CCOS visits before (n = 2203) and after (n = 5924) critical care were matched 1:1 to 3 control pools: historical admissions to the same unit before introduction of CCOS, admissions to a unit in a hospital with no CCOS, and contemporary admissions to the same unit not receiving CCOS visits. Matching was based on individual factors and on propensity.
RESULTS: The CCOS visits preadmission were not associated with differences in severity of illness, but were associated with lower rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, longer prior hospital stay, and longer unit stay. The CCOS visits postdischarge were associated with lower hospital mortality and shorter hospital stay in 2 matches, but not when compared with contemporary admissions to the same unit.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a benefit to scheduled follow-up visits of patients discharged from critical care. Results for CCOS before critical care are inconclusive. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20534334     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  7 in total

1.  Rapid response teams improve outcomes: yes.

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Francesca Rubulotta; John Welch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The impact of critical care transition programs on outcomes after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge: can we get there from here?

Authors:  Regis Goulart Rosa; Juçara Gasparetto Maccari; Ricardo Viegas Cremonese; Tulio Frederico Tonietto; Rafael Viegas Cremonese; Cassiano Teixeira
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Mortality related to after-hours discharge from intensive care in Australia and New Zealand, 2005-2012.

Authors:  Dashiell Gantner; Kj Farley; Michael Bailey; Sue Huckson; Peter Hicks; David Pilcher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.

Authors:  Jennifer McGaughey; Dean A Fergusson; Peter Van Bogaert; Louise Rose
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-22

5.  Outcomes of hospitalized hematologic oncology patients receiving rapid response system activation for acute deterioration.

Authors:  Benjamin Gershkovich; Shannon M Fernando; Brent Herritt; Lana A Castellucci; Bram Rochwerg; Laveena Munshi; Sangeeta Mehta; Andrew J E Seely; Daniel I McIsaac; Alexandre Tran; Peter M Reardon; Peter Tanuseputro; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  [Intensive care of patients with [infarct-related] cardiogenic shock : Abridged version of the S1 guideline].

Authors:  C Hermes; T Ochmann; C Keienburg; M Kegel; D Schindele; J Klausmeier; E Adrigan
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.552

7.  A comparison of alternative strategies for choosing control populations in observational studies.

Authors:  Adam Steventon; Richard Grieve; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2015-01-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.