BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a standardization method to pool data recorded on different activities of daily living (ADL) scales in order to reduce variability of functional outcome data from Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials and to better evaluate the effect of donepezil treatment on function in patients with AD. METHODS: Based on pre-specified criteria, six studies were selected from among all donepezil clinical trials in AD. Individual items from nine ADL scales used in these trials were mapped to a standardized functional scale comprising 12 domains (six basic, six instrumental); scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale. External validation of this scale yielded a concordance rate of 90.8%. For each domain, mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in the placebo and donepezil groups was compared for the total population and for subgroups stratified by baseline disease severity. Study settings included outpatient, assisted living, and skilled nursing facilities. Participants comprised 2183 patients (donepezil, 1261; placebo; 922) with baseline Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores 5-26. RESULTS: Significant treatment differences favoring donepezil were observed for five items (two instrumental and three basic). Patients with moderate AD at baseline (MMSE 10-17) demonstrated the greatest treatment effect. CONCLUSION: Functional data were successfully pooled using standardizing methodology. A beneficial effect of donepezil treatment on function was demonstrated using this standardized functional scale. Similar analyses from studies with other anti-dementia drugs may help to determine the generalizability of these findings and potentially encourage use of functional assessment as a clinical tool.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a standardization method to pool data recorded on different activities of daily living (ADL) scales in order to reduce variability of functional outcome data from Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials and to better evaluate the effect of donepezil treatment on function in patients with AD. METHODS: Based on pre-specified criteria, six studies were selected from among all donepezil clinical trials in AD. Individual items from nine ADL scales used in these trials were mapped to a standardized functional scale comprising 12 domains (six basic, six instrumental); scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale. External validation of this scale yielded a concordance rate of 90.8%. For each domain, mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in the placebo and donepezil groups was compared for the total population and for subgroups stratified by baseline disease severity. Study settings included outpatient, assisted living, and skilled nursing facilities. Participants comprised 2183 patients (donepezil, 1261; placebo; 922) with baseline Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores 5-26. RESULTS: Significant treatment differences favoring donepezil were observed for five items (two instrumental and three basic). Patients with moderate AD at baseline (MMSE 10-17) demonstrated the greatest treatment effect. CONCLUSION: Functional data were successfully pooled using standardizing methodology. A beneficial effect of donepezil treatment on function was demonstrated using this standardized functional scale. Similar analyses from studies with other anti-dementia drugs may help to determine the generalizability of these findings and potentially encourage use of functional assessment as a clinical tool.
Authors: P J G H Kamphuis; F R J Verhey; M G M Olde Rikkert; J W R Twisk; S H N Swinkels; P Scheltens Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Vikas Kotagal; Kenneth M Langa; Brenda L Plassman; Gwenith G Fisher; Bruno J Giordani; Robert B Wallace; James R Burke; David C Steffens; Mohammed Kabeto; Roger L Albin; Norman L Foster Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sebastian Voigt-Radloff; Maud Graff; Rainer Leonhart; Katrin Schornstein; Frank Jessen; Jens Bohlken; Brigitte Metz; Andreas Fellgiebel; Richard Dodel; Gerhard Eschweiler; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Marcel Olde Rikkert; Michael Hüll Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Roy Jones; David Wilkinson; Oscar L Lopez; Jeffrey Cummings; Gunhild Waldemar; Richard Zhang; Joan Mackell; Serge Gauthier Journal: Trials Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 2.279