Literature DB >> 20533922

Children's participation in health research: from objects to agents?

E K Clavering1, J McLaughlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the UK, there is a growing recognition of the need to include children's accounts in research on paediatric health care. This paper seeks to examine ways in which children have been included in health-related studies to identify strengths and weaknesses.
METHODS: Key empirical based studies were identified via comprehensive searches of academic literature databases to exemplify research practices related to three ways of engaging with children in health-related research. These three approaches are summarized as research on children, with children and by children.
RESULTS: Research on children engages with adult 'authorities', such as parents and medical professionals. This approach allows some access to children including those understood as hard-to-reach: for example, pre-speech infants, or children with complex developmental disabilities. Research with children includes children as respondents to engage directly with their own understandings. This may be achieved alongside adult representatives, or by focusing only on the children themselves. Research by children encourages children to participate in the research process itself. This may occur across any, or indeed, every stage from design to dissemination to enable children to set the agenda themselves. Each of the three approaches has strengths and weaknesses, and involves some form of adult-mediation.
CONCLUSION: Inclusion of children's perspectives can be achieved, at varying levels, in each approach (on, with and by) examined here. Although claims to authority around including children's perspectives may appear to hold more credence when children have directly participated in the research, there may be times when this is neither possible nor appropriate. Researchers are challenged to be open and reflexive about ways in which children are engaged with, incorporated in and represented across the many stages of research. Whichever approach is taken, ethical issues and notions of equity remain problematic. This point holds particular resonance for ways in which ethics around children may be considered in National Health Service ethics governance processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20533922     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01094.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Care Health Dev        ISSN: 0305-1862            Impact factor:   2.508


  12 in total

Review 1.  Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanneke A Haijes; Ghislaine J M W van Thiel
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  '[I would like] a place to be alone, other than the toilet'--Children's perspectives on paediatric hospital care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Inge Schalkers; Christine W M Dedding; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  "Seeing the Life": Redefining self-worth and family roles among Iraqi refugee families resettled in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew Nelson; Julia Meredith Hess; Brian Isakson; Jessica Goodkind
Journal:  J Int Migr Integr       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  Visualising difference, similarity and belonging in paediatric genetics.

Authors:  Janice McLaughlin; Emma K Clavering
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2011-11-03

5.  Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.

Authors:  Pooria Sarrami-Foroushani; Joanne Travaglia; Deborah Debono; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The burden of proof: The process of involving young people in research.

Authors:  Gail Dovey-Pearce; Sophie Walker; Sophie Fairgrieve; Monica Parker; Tim Rapley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study: survivors of childhood critical illness exploring long-term psychosocial well-being and needs--The SCETCH Project.

Authors:  Joseph C Manning; Pippa Hemingway; Sarah A Redsell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review.

Authors:  Felix Gradinger; Nicky Britten; Katrina Wyatt; Katherine Froggatt; Andy Gibson; Ann Jacoby; Fiona Lobban; Debbie Mayes; Dee Snape; Tim Rawcliffe; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Perspectives of adolescents on decision making about participation in a biobank study: a pilot study.

Authors:  Petronella Grootens-Wiegers; Eline G Visser; Annemarie M C van Rossum; Claudia N van Waardhuizen; Saskia N de Wildt; Boudewijn Sweep; Jos M van den Broek; Martine C de Vries
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2017-08-23

10.  'I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.' On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Malou L Luchtenberg; Els L M Maeckelberghe; Aa Eduard Verhagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.