Literature DB >> 20533536

Comparing the learning curve for robotically assisted and straight stick laparoscopic procedures in surgical novices.

T G Rashid1, M Kini, T E J Ind.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery has a different learning curve to straight stick laparoscopic surgery. The learning curve for novices is likely to be different to that for experienced surgeons. We assessed the early learning curve for trainees with 18 months or less of surgical experience.
METHODS: Six surgical novices performed 120 exercises using laparoscopic instruments and a DaVinci S robot. The exercise comprised cutting out a computer-generated paper circle. Time to completion, number of instrument changes and accuracy were compared (Kruskal-Wallis test).
RESULTS: Trainees required significantly less time using the robot (326 vs. 433 s; p < 0.0001); recorded fewer mistakes (1 vs. 4.5; p < 0.0001) and fewer instrument changes (1 vs. 3; p < 0.0001). Significant improvement was demonstrated in time, number of mistakes and instrument changes for robotically-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
CONCLUSION: For surgical novices tested on an in vitro dexterity exercise, a robotically assisted laparoscopic system offers a shorter learning curve and improved accuracy compared to straight stick surgery. Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20533536     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  14 in total

1.  Robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass: are they comparable?

Authors:  Pietro Addeo; Nicolas C Buchs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A novel device designed to improve the operability of energy devices with foot pedals in endoscopic surgery: the Foot-Site Monitor.

Authors:  Akihiro Kondo; Yuji Nishizawa; Yasumasa Horikiri; Hiroki Amemori; Yuichiro Tsukada; Takeshi Sasaki; Toshikazu Kawai; Hiroyuki Daiko; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Why do we argue about route of hysterectomy? A call for dialogue.

Authors:  Andrew J Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci(®) Surgical System.

Authors:  Yasuo Sumi; Parag W Dhumane; Koji Komeda; Bernard Dallemagne; Daisuke Kuroda; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-02-11

Review 5.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; ZhengQiang Wei; MengJun Bie; XuDong Peng; Cheng Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Differences in hand movements and task completion times between laparoscopic, robotically assisted, and open surgery: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Latha Balasubramani; David A Milliken; John H Shepherd; Thomas E J Ind
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-20

7.  Comparison of Short-term Surgical Outcomes between a Robotic Colectomy and a Laparoscopic Colectomy during Early Experience.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-02-29

8.  Contemporary Series of Robotic-Assisted Distal Ureteral Reconstruction Utilizing Side Docking Position.

Authors:  Rick C Slater; Nicholas J Farber; Julie M Riley; Yaniv Shilo; Michael C Ost
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Ind; Alex Laios; Matthew Hacking; Marielle Nobbenhuis
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction: а systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Konstantin Kolontarev; George Kasyan; Dmitry Pushkar
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.