Literature DB >> 20532919

Naturalization of plant populations: the role of cultivation and population size and density.

Mark S Minton1, Richard N Mack.   

Abstract

Field experimentation is required to assess the effects of environmental stochasticity on small immigrant plant populations-a widely understood but largely unexplored aspect of predicting any species' likelihood of naturalization and potential invasion. Cultivation can mitigate this stochasticity, although the outcome for a population under cultivation nevertheless varies enormously from extinction to persistence. Using factorial experiments, we investigated the effects of population size, density, and cultivation (irrigation) on the fate of founder populations for four alien species with different life history characteristics (Echinochloa frumentacea, Fagopyrum esculentum, Helianthus annuus, and Trifolium incarnatum) in eastern Washington, USA. The fate of founder populations was highly variable within and among the 3 years of experimentation and illustrates the often precarious environment encountered by plant immigrants. Larger founder populations produced more seeds (P < 0.001); the role of founder population size, however, differed among years. Irrigation resulted in higher percent survival (P < 0.001) and correspondingly larger net reproductive rate (R(0); P < 0.001). But the minimum level of irrigation for establishment, R(0) > 1, differed among years and species. Sowing density did not affect the likelihood of establishment for any species. Our results underscore the importance of environmental stochasticity in determining the fate of founder populations and the potential of cultivation and large population size in countering the long odds against naturalization. Any implementation of often proposed post-immigration field trials to assess the risk of an alien species becoming naturalized, a requisite step toward invasion, will need to assess different sizes of founder populations and the extent and character of cultivation (intentional or unintentional) that the immigrants might receive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532919     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1667-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders.

Authors:  C S. Kolar; D M. Lodge
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Predicting extinction risks for plants: environmental stochasticity can save declining populations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors.

Authors:  Mathieu Rouget; David M Richardson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions.

Authors:  Julie L Lockwood; Phillip Cassey; Tim Blackburn
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland.

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; Philip A Fay; John M Blair; Scott L Collins; Melinda D Smith; Jonathan D Carlisle; Christopher W Harper; Brett T Danner; Michelle S Lett; James K McCarron
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  R Lande; S H Orzack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetics and demography in biological conservation.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Potential role of masting by introduced bamboos in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) population irruptions holds public health consequences.

Authors:  Melissa C Smith; Richard Gomulkiewicz; Richard N Mack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.