Literature DB >> 20532899

Segmental transports for posttraumatic lower extremity bone defects: are femoral bone transports safer than tibial?

Emmanouil Liodakis1, Mohamed Kenawey, Christian Krettek, Max Ettinger, Michael Jagodzinski, Stefan Hankemeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes following femoral and tibial segment transports are not well documented. Purpose of the study is to compare the complication rates and life quality scores of femoral and tibial transports in order to find what are the complication rates of femoral and tibial monorail bone transports and if they are different?
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 8 femoral and 14 tibial consecutive segment transports performed with the monorail technique between 2001 and 2008 in our institution. Mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 2.1 years with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Aetiology of the defects was posttraumatic in all cases. Four femoral (50%) and nine tibial (64%) fractures were open. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey was used to compare the life quality after femoral and tibial bone transports. The Mann-Whiney U test, Fisher exact test, and the Student's two tailed t-test were used for statistical analysis. P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS: The tibial transport was associated with higher rates of severe complications and additional procedures (1.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.4 ± 2.7, p = 0.048). Three patients of the tibial group were amputated because of recurrent infections and one developed a complete regenerate insufficiency that was treated with partial diaphyseal tibial replacement. Contrary to that none of patients of the femoral group developed a complete regenerate insufficiency or was amputated.
CONCLUSIONS: Tibial bone transports have a higher rate of complete and incomplete regenerate insufficiency and can more often end in an amputation. The authors suggest systematic weekly controls of the CRP value and of the callus formation in patients with posttraumatic tibia bone transports. Further comparative studies comparing the results of bone transports with and without intramedullary implants are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532899     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1129-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Ulrich Wiebking; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [MagicTube: new possibilities for completely internal bone segmental transport and optional lengthening : New additional module for motorized lengthening nails for treatment of large bone defects].

Authors:  Christian Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Union, complication, reintervention and failure rates of surgical techniques for large diaphyseal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Feltri; Luca Solaro; Alessandro Di Martino; Christian Candrian; Costantino Errani; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  [Plate-assisted segmental bone transport with a lengthening nail and a plate : A new technique for treatment of tibial and femoral bone defects].

Authors:  Ulrik Kähler Olesen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Mechanical solutions to salvage failed distraction osteogenesis in large bone defect management.

Authors:  Dmitry Y Borzunov; Alexander L Shastov
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Complications of bone transport technique using the Ilizarov method in the lower extremity: a retrospective analysis of 282 consecutive cases over 10 years.

Authors:  Yanshi Liu; Maimaiaili Yushan; Zhenhui Liu; Jialin Liu; Chuang Ma; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Bifocal or Trifocal (Double-Level) Bone Transport Using Unilateral Rail System in the Treatment of Large Tibial Defects Caused by Infection: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Maimaiaili Yushan; Peng Ren; Abulaiti Abula; Yamuhanmode Alike; Alimujiang Abulaiti; Chuang Ma; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Acute shortening and re-lengthening versus antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded bone transport for the management of large segmental tibial defects after trauma.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; YiBo Xu; Yao Lu; Cheng Ren; Lu Liu; Ming Li; Qian Wang; Zhong Li; HanZhong Xue; Kun Zhang; Teng Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Yanshi Liu; Feiyu Cai; Chenchen Fan; Peng Ren; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.