Literature DB >> 20532636

A primary current distribution model of a novel micro-electroporation channel configuration.

Gregory D Troszak1, Boris Rubinsky.   

Abstract

Traditional macro and micro-electroporation devices utilize facing electrodes, which generate electric fields inversely proportional to their separation distance. Although the separation distances in micro-electroporation devices are significantly smaller than those in macro-electroporation devices, they are limited by cell size. Because of this, significant potential differences are required to induce electroporation. These potential differences are often large enough to cause water electrolysis, resulting in electrode depletion and bubble formation, both of which adversely affect the electroporation process. Here, we present a theoretical study of a novel micro-electroporation channel composed of an electrolyte flowing over a series of adjacent electrodes separated by infinitesimally small insulators. Application of a small, non-electrolysis inducing potential difference between the adjacent electrodes results in radially-varying electric fields that emanate from these insulators, causing cells flowing through the channel to experience a pulsed electric field. This eliminates the need for a pulse generator, making a minimal power source (such as a battery) the only electrical equipment that is needed. A non-dimensional primary current distribution model of the novel micro-electroporation channel shows that decreasing the channel height results in an exponential increase in the electric field magnitude, and that cells experience exponentially greater electric field magnitudes the closer they are to the channel walls. Finally, dimensional primary current distribution models of two potential applications, water sterilization and cell transfection, demonstrate the practical feasibility of the novel micro-electroporation channel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532636      PMCID: PMC2916117          DOI: 10.1007/s10544-010-9437-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  6 in total

Review 1.  Electroporation of cells in microfluidic devices: a review.

Authors:  M B Fox; D C Esveld; A Valero; R Luttge; H C Mastwijk; P V Bartels; A van den Berg; R M Boom
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Electroporation of cell membranes: a review.

Authors:  S Y Ho; G S Mittal
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.429

3.  Model of cell electrofusion. Membrane electroporation, pore coalescence and percolation.

Authors:  I P Sugar; W Förster; E Neumann
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1987-05-09       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Effects of pulsed electric fields on inactivation kinetics of Listeria innocua.

Authors:  P C Wouters; N Dutreux; J P Smelt; H L Lelieveld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Use of voltage pulses for the pore opening and drug loading, and the subsequent resealing of red blood cells.

Authors:  T Y Tsong; K Kinosita
Journal:  Bibl Haematol       Date:  1985

6.  Electric field mediated gene transfer.

Authors:  T K Wong; E Neumann
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1982-07-30       Impact factor: 3.575

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  A theoretical analysis of the feasibility of a singularity-induced micro-electroporation system.

Authors:  Gregory D Troszak; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Simultaneous electroporation and dielectrophoresis in non-electrolytic micro/nano-electroporation.

Authors:  Chenang Lyu; Jianping Wang; Matthew Powell-Palm; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Advanced pancreatic cancer: The standard of care and new opportunities.

Authors:  Amrallah A Mohammad
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2018-09-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.