| Literature DB >> 20532099 |
Kishor Patwardhan1, Sangeeta Gehlot, Girish Singh, H C S Rathore.
Abstract
In the present day scenario, Ayurveda is globally being perceived in several contradictory ways. Poor quality of Ayurveda graduates produced as a result of poorly structured and poorly regulated education system is at least one of the important factors responsible for this scenario. The present study was carried out to evaluate the 'Global challenges of graduate level Ayurvedic education' and is based on the responses of Ayurvedic students and Ayurvedic teachers from various educational institutions of India to a methodically validated questionnaire. As the study indicates, the poor standard of Ayurvedic education in India is definitely a cause of concern. The curriculum of Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) course of studies is required to be reviewed and restructured. The syllabi are required to be updated with certain relevant topics like laws governing the intellectual property rights, basic procedures of standardization of medicinal products, fundamental methods of evaluating the toxicity of the medicinal products, essentials of healthcare management and the basics of cultivation and marketing of medicinal plants. Furthermore, the study suggests that the Ayurvedic academicians are required to be trained in standard methods of research and documentation skills, and the educational institutions are required to be encouraged to contribute their share in building up the evidence base for Ayurveda in the form of quality education and research.Entities:
Keywords: Ayurveda education; India; global challenges; mailed survey
Year: 2010 PMID: 20532099 PMCID: PMC2876920 DOI: 10.4103/0974-7788.59945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Ayurveda Res ISSN: 0974-7788
Responses of the participants to the items related to the ‘Job Opportunities after BAMS course’. The mean scores for both the groups are given along with the results of Independent samples-t test.
| Items | Group | Mean±SD | t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1.1 | Legally, in most of the states, a BAMS degree holder cannot practice Allopathy and therefore hospitals generally prefer MBBS graduates as medical offi cers instead of BAMS graduates. | Students | 439 ± 0.945 | 6.732 | 0.000 |
| Teachers | 3.94 ± 1.142 | ||||
| Q1.2 | Ayurvedic hospitals are less in number in comparison to Allopathic ones and therefore job opportunities are limited. | Students | 4.41 ± 0.876 | 2.415 | 0.016 |
| Teachers | 4.27 ± 0.881 | ||||
| Q1.3 | In Ayurvedic educational institutionsonly Post-Graduate doctors are employed and not BAMS degree holders. | Students | 4.15 ± 1.064 | 4.717 | 0.000 |
| Teachers | 3.81 ± 1.165 | ||||
| Q1.4 | Most of the research institutions prefer Post-Graduate doctors and thereforejob opportunities in research institutions are limited. | Students | 4.34 ± 0.830 | 2.866 | 0.004 |
| Teachers | 4.19 ± 0.831 | ||||
| Q1.5 | Even in government sectorBAMS graduates are not treated at par with MBBS graduates and thereforejob opportunities are limited in certain areas e.g. Railways. | Students | 4.69 ± 0.610 | 3.808 | 0.000 |
| Teachers | 4.53 ± 0.718 | ||||
| Q1.6 | Ayurvedic pharmaceutical firms prefer Post-Graduate candidates to BAMS degree holders as experts. | Students | 4.28 ± 0.803 | 3.476 | 0.001 |
| Teachers | 4.09 ± 0.898 | ||||
| Q1.7 | There is lot of competition for jobs among BAMS degree holders as a result of mushrooming of Ayurvedic colleges. | Students | 4.21 ± 0.955 | 1.140 | 0.255 |
| Teachers | 4.14 ± 1.010 |
Responses of the participants to the items related to the ‘Entrepreneurship /Business opportunities’ after the BAMS course. The mean scores for both the groups are given along with the results of Independent samples-t test.
| Item | Group | Mean± SD | t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3.1 | Students are not trained in management skills required to launch a new Ayurvedic hospital/Panchakarma center/Ayurvedic Pharmacy during BAMS course. | Students | 4.18 ± 1.051 | 2.170 | 0.030 |
| Teachers | 4.03 ± 0.981 | ||||
| Q3.2 | Students are not exposed to the basics of economical aspects related to healthcare sector during BAMS course. | Students | 4.18 ± 0.890 | 2.078 | 0.038 |
| Teachers | 4.06 ± 0.856 | ||||
| Q3.3 | Most of the BAMS graduates prefer either studying PG course or they go for private practice and thereforeinspiring examples of industrially successful BAMS graduates are very few. | Students | 4.38 ± 0.750 | 5.693 | 0.000 |
| Teachers | 4.09 ± 0.840 | ||||
| Q3.4 | Students are not introduced to the skills related to the management of Health tourism and emerging opportunities in this field during BAMS course. | Students | 4.35 ± 0.782 | 2.452 | 0.014 |
| Teachers | 4.23 ± 0.776 | ||||
| Q3.5 | Students are not exposed to the agricultural and marketing aspects of medicinal plants making it difficult to go for cultivation/marketing of medicinal plants. | Students | 4.39 ± 0.690 | 3.430 | 0.001 |
| Teachers | 4.22 ± 0.800 | ||||
| Q3.6 | Students are not exposed to the manufacturing techniques related to cosmetic products and such other popular dosage forms during BAMS course making them unfit for modern pharmaceutical industry. | Students | 4.34 ± 0.867 | 3.102 | 0.002 |
| Teachers | 4.16 ± 0.864 |
Responses of the participants to the items related to the ‘Global Issues concerned to Ayurveda’. The mean scores for both the groups are given along with the results of Independent samples-t test.
| Item | Group | Mean ±SD | t | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2.1 | Serious questions are being raised on the safety profile of Ayurvedic preparations in some countries posing a threat to the Ayurvedic system of Medicine. | Students | 4.27 ± 0.867 | 4.496 | 0.000 |
| Teachers | 4.00 ± 1.013 | ||||
| Q2.2 | Standardization of Ayurvedic preparations is still a problem that needs to be addressed. | Students | 4.47 ± 0.706 | 3.338 | 0.001 |
| Teachers | 4.31 ± 0.738 | ||||
| Q2.3 | In many countrieslegallypracticing Ayurveda is not allowed and thereforethere are no opportunities for BAMS graduates in such countries. | Students | 4.40 ± 0.833 | 2.380 | 0.018 |
| Teachers | 4.27 ± 0.792 | ||||
| Q2.4 | Possible entry of foreign universities in India may pose a threat to the existing educational institutions. | Students | 3.77 ± 1.158 | 3.460 | 0.001 |
| Teachers | 3.51 ± 1.202 | ||||
| Q2.5 | Ayurvedic academicians do not figure anywhere in authoring the scientific and evidence-based papers in reputed international journals. | Students | 3.95 ± 1.081 | 1.490 | 0.136 |
| Teachers | 3.84 ± 1.081 | ||||
| Q2.6 | Ayurvedic academicians do not voluntarily participate in International platforms to present their research data. | Students | 3.79 ± 1.131 | 0.756 | 0.450 |
| Teachers | 3.73 ± 1.138 | ||||
| Q2.7 | Ayurvedic academicians do not follow international standards while planning the protocols of research projects and while writing research reports. | Students | 3.86 ± 1.045 | -0.095 | 0.924 |
| Teachers | 3.87 ± 1.020 | ||||
| Q2.8 | Ayurvedic scholars generally do not have knowledge regarding'Intellectual Property Rights' and patenting procedures. | Students | 3.97 ± 0.943 | 0.824 | 0.410 |
| Teachers | 3.92 ± 0.975 | ||||
| Q2.9 | Authentic websites providing up-to-date knowledge in Ayurveda are not hosted by Ayurvedic institutions. | Students | 4.20 ± 0.918 | 0.073 | 0.942 |
| Teachers | 4.19 ± 0.769 | ||||
| Q2.10 | No standard international indexed and peer-reviewed journals are published by Ayurvedic institutions making it difficult for Ayurvedic researches have global attention. | Students | 4.19 ± 0.885 | 0.628 | 0.530 |
| Teachers | 4.15 ± 0.853 | ||||
| Q2.11 | Pharmacodynamic/ pharmacokinetic properties/efficacy/safety profiles and chemical compositions of Ayurvedic formulations are yet to be established making it difficult for experts in conventional medicine to accept Ayurveda. | Students | 4.25 ± 0.893 | 1.896 | 0.058 |
| Teachers | 4.15 ± 0.809 |