| Literature DB >> 20531991 |
Sudipta Pandit1, Atin Dey, Arunabha Datta Chaudhuri, Mita Saha, Amitava Sengupta, Sushmita Kundu, Sourin Bhuniya, Shib Singh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Revised National Tuberculosis Control programme (RNTCP), India. AIM: To assess the impact of the expansion of the RNTCP in the case detection and treatment outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Directly observed treatment-short course; India; Kolkata; revised national tuberculosis control programme; tuberculosis
Year: 2009 PMID: 20531991 PMCID: PMC2876694 DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.56343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lung India ISSN: 0970-2113
Performance of revised national tuberclosis control programme case detection and smear conversion
| Year | Population (in lakh) | Total patients initiated on treatment | Annual total case detection rate per lakh | New smear positive patients initiated on treatment | Annual new smear-positive case detection rate per lakh (%) | % of sputum positive of total new pulmonary cases | 3-month conversion rate of new smear-positive patients (%) | Cure rate of new smear-positive patients (%) | No. of new smear-negative patients initiated on treatment | No. of new EP cases initiated on treatment | Percentage of new EP cases among all new cases | No. of smear-positive re-treatment cases initiated on treatment | Percentage of re-treatment cases of all smear-positive cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 4.65 | 406 | 87 | 192 | 41 (54) | 80 | 88 | 90 | 47 | 63 | 21 | 98 | 34 |
| 2002 | 4.72 | 411 | 87 | 189 | 40 (53) | 78 | 78 | 82 | 54 | 64 | 21 | 94 | 33 |
| 2003 | 4.80 | 554 | 115 | 257 | 54 (72) | 84 | 74 | 86 | 59 | 97 | 23 | 125 | 33 |
| 2004 | 4.88 | 740 | 152 | 329 | 67 (89) | 82 | 82 | 81 | 71 | 159 | 28 | 165 | 33 |
| 2005 | 4.96 | 703 | 142 | 301 | 61 (81) | 80 | 77 | 76 | 77 | 153 | 29 | 153 | 34 |
| Total | 2814 | 1268 | 308 | 536 | 635 |
Treatment outcome
| Year | New smear positive | New smear negative | New extrapulmonary | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total no. of patients registered | Cure (%) | Completed | Died (%) | Failure (%) | Defaulted (%) | Total no. of patients registered | Cure | Completed (%) | Died (%) | Failure (%) | Defaulted (%) | Total no. of patients registered | Cure | Completed (%) | Died (%) | Failure (%) | Defaulted (%) | |
| 2001 | 192 | 90 | 0 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 6.7 | 47 | 0 | 93.6 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 63 | 0 | 93.6 | 0 | 0 | 6.3 |
| 2002 | 189 | 82 | 0 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 8.4 | 54 | 0 | 96.3 | 0 | 3.8 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 93.7 | 3.1 | 0 | 3.1 |
| 2003 | 257 | 86 | 0 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 6.6 | 59 | 0 | 89.8 | 0 | 0 | 10.2 | 97 | 0 | 94.8 | 2.1 | 0 | 3.1 |
| 2004 | 329 | 81 | 0 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 10.9 | 71 | 0 | 85.9 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 9.8 | 159 | 0 | 89.9 | 3.1 | 0 | 6.9 |
| 2005 | 301 | 76 | 0 | 3.3 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 77 | 0 | 83.1 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 11.7 | 153 | 0 | 91.5 | 3.9 | 0 | 4.5 |
| Total | 1268 | 308 | 536 | |||||||||||||||