Literature DB >> 20531083

Risk reduction in pleural procedures: sonography, simulation and supervision.

John M Wrightson1, Edward Fysh, Nick A Maskell, Yun C G Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Complications from pleural drainage procedures are common, but their incidence is often underrecognized. Significant morbidity and mortality can arise, particularly as a result of poor procedural technique, lack of training and inadequate supervision. This review discusses safety considerations of common pleural procedures, methods for risk minimization and training issues. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent data have identified deaths and significant adverse events associated with pleural drainage procedures. Evidence suggests that significant risk reduction might be achieved by restricting the number of physicians authorized to perform a pleural aspiration to a smaller expert group who have had specific training and regularly perform the procedure. Pleural ultrasound has been shown to increase the accuracy of fluid localization and decrease the risk of postprocedure pneumothorax.
SUMMARY: Strategies to improve physician training, reduce unnecessary pleural procedures and improve site selection (using pleural ultrasound) may reduce complication rates. Consequently, several international authorities have recently published updated guidelines and educational packages aimed at improving the safety of pleural intervention. Pleural ultrasound has the potential to significantly decrease adverse event rates, but requires specific training and has several possible pitfalls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20531083     DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32833a233b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med        ISSN: 1070-5287            Impact factor:   3.155


  19 in total

Review 1.  Pleural infection.

Authors:  John M Wrightson; Nick A Maskell
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Longitudinal Ultrasound Curriculum Improves Long-Term Retention Among Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Diana J Kelm; John T Ratelle; Nabeel Azeem; Sara L Bonnes; Andrew J Halvorsen; Amy S Oxentenko; Anjali Bhagra
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Switching off malignant pleural effusion formation-fantasy or future?

Authors:  Magda Spella; Anastasios D Giannou; Georgios T Stathopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Letter To The Editor: Catheter Track Metastasis With Indwelling Pleural Catheter.

Authors:  Sara Zank; Elham Abboud; Wissam Jaber; Abdul Hamid Alraiyes
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

Review 5.  Indwelling pleural catheters: complications and management strategies.

Authors:  Michel Chalhoub; Amina Saqib; Michael Castellano
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Treating Recurrent Pleural Disease: A Review of Indications and Technique for Chemical Pleurodesis for the Interventional Radiologist.

Authors:  Surbhi B Trivedi; Matthew Niemeyer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

7.  Pleural infection-current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Rosenstengel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Complications of indwelling pleural catheter use and their management.

Authors:  Macy M S Lui; Rajesh Thomas; Y C Gary Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2016-02-05

9.  Creating thoracic phantoms for diagnostic and procedural ultrasound training.

Authors:  James Rippey; Ian Gawthrope
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Phantom model and scoring system to assess ability in ultrasound-guided chest drain positioning.

Authors:  Luigi Vetrugno; Giovanni Volpicelli; Federico Barbariol; Ilaria Toretti; Livia Pompei; Francesco Forfori; Giorgio Della Rocca
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2016-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.