Literature DB >> 20531071

Prospective ten-year follow-up study comparing patients with whiplash-associated disorders and asymptomatic subjects using magnetic resonance imaging.

Morio Matsumoto1, Eijiro Okada, Daisuke Ichihara, Kazuhiro Chiba, Yoshiaki Toyama, Hirokazu Fujiwara, Suketaka Momoshima, Yuji Nishiwaki, Takeshi Hashimoto, Tomoo Inoue, Masahiko Watanabe, Takeshi Takahata.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective 10-year follow-up study of patients with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) and asymptomatic volunteers.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify long-term impact of whiplash injury on patient's symptoms and on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Long-term prognosis of WAD has not been fully elucidated.
METHODS: Between 1993 and 1996, we conducted cross-sectional comparative study of 508 acute WAD patients and 497 asymptomatic volunteers, all of whom underwent MRI of the cervical spine. For this follow-up study, 133 WAD patients and 223 control subjects were recruited again. All participants underwent follow-up MRI and physical examination, and answered to questionnaires regarding neck symptoms. Evaluation of MRI included decrease in signal intensity of discs, posterior disc protrusion, disc space narrowing, and foraminal stenosis using 2 to 4 numerical grades. Increase in the numerical grades by one or more was considered to be progression of degenerative changes.
RESULTS: Progression of decrease in signal intensity was observed in 109 WAD patients (82.0%), and 132 control subjects (59.2%), (age, sex adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 3.06), posterior disc protrusion in 101 (75.9%) and in 155 (69.5%) (OR = 1.46), disc space narrowing in 33 (24.8%) and in 59 (26.5%) (OR = 0.98), and foraminal stenosis in 6 (4.5%), and in 20 (9.0%) (OR = 0.52), respectively. Neck pain was observed in 34 WAD patients (25.6%) and 22 control subjects (9.9%) (P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant correlation between neck pain and progression in each MR finding in either group.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that, although some WAD patients are more likely to suffer from long-lasting neck pain, MRI findings cannot explain the symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20531071     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c9a8c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  The nosological classification of whiplash-associated disorder: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joe H Ghorayeb
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2021-04

3.  Does Overall Cervical Spine Pathology Relate to the Clinical Heterogeneity of Chronic Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Todd B Parrish; David M Walton; Amy J Vassallo; Joel Fundaun; Marie Wasielewski; D Mark Courtney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Prevalence of degenerative and spondyloarthritis-related magnetic resonance imaging findings in the spine and sacroiliac joints in patients with persistent low back pain.

Authors:  Bodil Arnbak; Tue S Jensen; Niels Egund; Anna Zejden; Kim Hørslev-Petersen; Claus Manniche; Anne G Jurik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Charles Hazle; Mark A Hoggarth; Jacob McPherson; Cheryl L Sparks; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Somatic symptoms beyond those generally associated with a whiplash injury are increased in self-reported chronic whiplash. A population-based cross sectional study: the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK).

Authors:  Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Hanne Gro Wenzel; Arnstein Mykletun
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Neck-specific exercise may reduce radiating pain and signs of neurological deficits in chronic whiplash - Analyses of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Maria Landén Ludvigsson; Gunnel Peterson; Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Towards defining muscular regions of interest from axial magnetic resonance imaging with anatomical cross-reference: part II - cervical spine musculature.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Jon Cornwall; Ewan Kennedy; Rebecca Abbott; Rebecca J Crawford
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Patient-reported outcomes measured with and without dizziness associated with non-specific chronic neck pain: implications for primary care.

Authors:  Raúl Ferrer-Peña; Gonzalo Vicente-de-Frutos; Diego Flandez-Santos; Carlos Martín-Gómez; Carolina Roncero-Jorge; César Calvo-Lobo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Pain and pain tolerance in whiplash-associated disorders: A population-based study.

Authors:  S M Myrtveit; J C Skogen; B Sivertsen; Ó A Steingrímsdóttir; A Stubhaug; C S Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.