Literature DB >> 20530868

Predicting the radiation exposure of terrestrial wildlife in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: an international comparison of approaches.

N A Beresford1, C L Barnett, J E Brown, J-J Cheng, D Copplestone, S Gaschak, A Hosseini, B J Howard, S Kamboj, T Nedveckaite, G Olyslaegers, J T Smith, J Vives I Batlle, S Vives-Lynch, C Yu.   

Abstract

There is now general acknowledgement that there is a requirement to demonstrate that species other than humans are protected from anthropogenic releases of radioactivity. A number of approaches have been developed for estimating the exposure of wildlife and some of these are being used to conduct regulatory assessments. There is a requirement to compare the outputs of such approaches against available data sets to ensure that they are robust and fit for purpose. In this paper we describe the application of seven approaches for predicting the whole-body ((90)Sr, (137)Cs, (241)Am and Pu isotope) activity concentrations and absorbed dose rates for a range of terrestrial species within the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Predictions are compared against available measurement data, including estimates of external dose rate recorded by thermoluminescent dosimeters attached to rodent species. Potential reasons for differences between predictions between the various approaches and the available data are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530868     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/S07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  8 in total

Review 1.  Radionuclide transfer to reptiles.

Authors:  Michael D Wood; Nicholas A Beresford; Dmitry V Semenov; Tamara L Yankovich; David Copplestone
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  The transfer of radionuclides to wildlife.

Authors:  N A Beresford
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Strontium-90 and caesium-137 activity concentrations in bats in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.

Authors:  Sergey Gashchak; Nicholas Anthony Beresford; Andrey Maksimenko; Anton S Vlaschenko
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  The estimation of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota: an extended intercomparison.

Authors:  J Vives i Batlle; K Beaugelin-Seiller; N A Beresford; D Copplestone; J Horyna; A Hosseini; M Johansen; S Kamboj; D-K Keum; N Kurosawa; L Newsome; G Olyslaegers; H Vandenhove; S Ryufuku; S Vives Lynch; M D Wood; C Yu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Impact assessment of ionizing radiation on human and non-human biota from the vicinity of a near-surface radioactive waste repository.

Authors:  T Nedveckaite; A Gudelis; J Vives i Batlle
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Assessment of exposure to ionizing radiation in Chernobyl tree frogs (Hyla orientalis).

Authors:  Pablo Burraco; Clément Car; Jean-Marc Bonzom; Germán Orizaola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Lack of impact of radiation on blood physiology biomarkers of Chernobyl tree frogs.

Authors:  Pablo Burraco; Jean-Marc Bonzom; Clément Car; Karine Beaugelin-Seiller; Sergey Gashchak; Germán Orizaola
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 8.  Preventive or potential therapeutic value of nutraceuticals against ionizing radiation-induced oxidative stress in exposed subjects and frequent fliers.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Giardi; Eleftherios Touloupakis; Delfina Bertolotto; Gabriele Mascetti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.