Literature DB >> 20530866

A multi-criteria weight of evidence approach for deriving ecological benchmarks for radioactive substances.

J Garnier-Laplace1, C Della-Vedova, P Andersson, D Copplestone, C Cailes, N A Beresford, B J Howard, P Howe, P Whitehouse.   

Abstract

Dose rate benchmarks are required in the tiered approaches used to screen out benign exposure scenarios in radiological ecological risk assessment. Such screening benchmarks, namely the predicted no-effect dose rates (PNEDR), have been derived by applying, as far as possible, the European guidance developed for chemicals. To derive the ecosystem level (or generic) PNEDR, radiotoxicity EDR(10) data (dose rates giving a 10% effect in comparison with the control) were used to fit a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) and estimate the HDR(5) (the hazardous dose rate affecting 5% of species with a 10% effect). Then, a multi-criteria approach was developed to justify using an assessment factor (AF) to apply to the HDR(5) for estimating a PNEDR value. Several different statistical data treatments were considered which all gave reasonably similar results. The suggested generic screening value of 10 microGy h(-1) (incremental dose rate) was derived using the lowest available EDR(10) value per species, an unweighted SSD, and an AF of 2 applied to the estimated HDR(5). Consideration was also given to deriving screening benchmark values for organism groups but this was not thought to be currently appropriate due to few relevant data being currently available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530866     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/S02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  11 in total

1.  The transfer of radionuclides to wildlife.

Authors:  N A Beresford
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Influence of long-term chronic exposure and weather conditions on Scots pine populations.

Authors:  Stanislav Geras'kin; Denis Vasiliyev; Ekaterina Makarenko; Polina Volkova; Alexey Kuzmenkov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Inter-comparison of population models for the calculation of radiation dose effects on wildlife.

Authors:  Jordi Vives I Batlle; Tatiana G Sazykina; Alexander Kryshev; Luigi Monte; Isao Kawaguchi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Changes in Growth, Morphology, and Physiology of Tetrahymena pyriformis Exposed to Continuous Cesium-137 and Cobalt-60 Gamma-Radiation.

Authors:  Soukaina Ziyadi; Abdelghani Iddar; Mostafa Kabine; Mohammed El Mzibri; Adnane Moutaouakkil
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Evaluation of radiation doses and associated risk from the Fukushima nuclear accident to marine biota and human consumers of seafood.

Authors:  Nicholas S Fisher; Karine Beaugelin-Seiller; Thomas G Hinton; Zofia Baumann; Daniel J Madigan; Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R.

Authors:  Christian Ritz; Florent Baty; Jens C Streibig; Daniel Gerhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation on the early zebrafish development and gene expression.

Authors:  Selma Hurem; Leonardo Martín Martín; Dag Anders Brede; Eystein Skjerve; Rasoul Nourizadeh-Lillabadi; Ole Christian Lind; Terje Christensen; Vidar Berg; Hans-Christian Teien; Brit Salbu; Deborah Helen Oughton; Peter Aleström; Jan Ludvig Lyche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of long-term radiological effects on plants and animals from a deep geological repository: no discernible impact detected.

Authors:  Jesper Torudd; Peter Saetre
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Radiological dose reconstruction for birds reconciles outcomes of Fukushima with knowledge of dose-effect relationships.

Authors:  Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace; Karine Beaugelin-Seiller; Claire Della-Vedova; Jean-Michel Métivier; Christian Ritz; Timothy A Mousseau; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.

Authors:  John J Cardarelli; Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.