Literature DB >> 20530781

Infection control assessment of ambulatory surgical centers.

Melissa K Schaefer1, Michael Jhung, Marilyn Dahl, Sarah Schillie, Crystal Simpson, Eloisa Llata, Ruth Link-Gelles, Ronda Sinkowitz-Cochran, Priti Patel, Elizabeth Bolyard, Lynne Sehulster, Arjun Srinivasan, Joseph F Perz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: More than 5000 ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in the United States participate in the Medicare program. Little is known about infection control practices in ASCs. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) piloted an infection control audit tool in a sample of ASC inspections to assess facility adherence to recommended practices.
OBJECTIVE: To describe infection control practices in a sample of ASCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All State Survey Agencies were invited to participate. Seven states volunteered; 3 were selected based on geographic dispersion, number of ASCs each state committed to inspect, and relative cost per inspection. A stratified random sample of ASCs was selected from each state. Sample size was based on the number of inspections each state estimated it could complete between June and October 2008. Sixty-eight ASCs were assessed; 32 in Maryland, 16 in North Carolina, and 20 in Oklahoma. Surveyors from CMS, trained in use of the audit tool, assessed compliance with specific infection control practices. Assessments focused on 5 areas of infection control: hand hygiene, injection safety and medication handling, equipment reprocessing, environmental cleaning, and handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of facilities with lapses in each infection control category.
RESULTS: Overall, 46 of 68 ASCs (67.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55.9%-77.9%) had at least 1 lapse in infection control; 12 of 68 ASCs (17.6%; 95% CI, 9.9%-28.1%) had lapses identified in 3 or more of the 5 infection control categories. Common lapses included using single-dose medication vials for more than 1 patient (18/64; 28.1%; 95% CI, 18.2%-40.0%), failing to adhere to recommended practices regarding reprocessing of equipment (19/67; 28.4%; 95% CI, 18.6%-40.0%), and lapses in handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment (25/54; 46.3%; 95% CI, 33.4%-59.6%).
CONCLUSION: Among a sample of US ASCs in 3 states, lapses in infection control were common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20530781     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Improving the safety of blood glucose monitoring.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Assisted monitoring of blood glucose: special safety needs for a new paradigm in testing glucose.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Joseph F Perz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

3.  The impact of depth of infection and postdischarge surveillance on rate of surgical-site infections in a network of community hospitals.

Authors:  David Y Ming; Luke F Chen; Becky A Miller; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 4.  Referrals of Infection Control Breaches to Public Health Authorities: Ambulatory Care Settings Experience, 2017.

Authors:  Barbara I Braun; Salome O Chitavi; Kiran M Perkins; Joseph F Perz; Ruth Link-Gelles; Jennifer Hoppe; Kristine M Donofrio; Yanhong Shen; Sylvia Garcia-Houchins
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2020-05-23

5.  Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Older Adults in Long-Term Care Settings: a Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kimberly J Alvarez; Arlene Smaldone; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Surgical site infections in outpatient surgeries: Less invasive procedures contribute substantially to the overall burden.

Authors:  Katherine Linsenmeyer; Westyn Branch-Elliman; Emily Kalver; Hillary J Mull
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Their Intended Effects on Outpatient Surgery.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; Anne M Suskind; Seth A Strope; Yun Zhang; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Duodenoscope-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Problem.

Authors:  M Rubayat Rahman; Abhilash Perisetti; Roxana Coman; Pardeep Bansal; Rajiv Chhabra; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Superbugs on Duodenoscopes: the Challenge of Cleaning and Disinfection of Reusable Devices.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Gerald McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Surgical site infection in hand surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Na Lu; Sebastian Unizony; Hyon K Choi; David Ring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.