Literature DB >> 20529885

What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other.

Konstanze Albrecht1, Kirsten G Volz, Matthias Sutter, David I Laibson, D Yves von Cramon.   

Abstract

People have present-biased preferences: they choose more impatiently when choosing between an immediate reward and a delayed reward, than when choosing between a delayed reward and a more delayed reward. Following McClure et al. [McClure, S.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G., Cohen, J.D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503.], we find that areas in the dopaminergic reward system show greater activation when a binary choice set includes both an immediate reward and a delayed reward in contrast to activation measured when the binary choice set contains only delayed rewards. The presence of an immediate reward in the choice set elevates activation of the ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior medial prefrontal cortex. These dopaminergic reward areas are also responsive to the identity of the recipient of the reward. Even an immediate reward does not activate these dopaminergic regions when the decision is being made for another person. Our results support the hypotheses that participants show less affective engagement (i) when they are making choices for themselves that only involve options in the future or (ii) when they are making choices for someone else. As hypothesized, we also find that behavioral choices reflect more patience when choosing for someone else.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20529885      PMCID: PMC3073390          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  31 in total

Review 1.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI.

Authors:  B Knutson; G W Fong; C M Adams; J L Varner; D Hommer
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  The anterior frontomedian cortex and evaluative judgment: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Stefan Zysset; Oswald Huber; Evelyn Ferstl; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Colin F Camerer; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness. Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  R D Lane; E M Reiman; B Axelrod; L S Yun; A Holmes; G E Schwartz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain.

Authors:  D A Gusnard; M E Raichle; M E Raichle
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour.

Authors:  O Devinsky; M J Morrell; B A Vogt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons.

Authors:  W Schultz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Contrasting roles of basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in impulsive choice.

Authors:  Catharine A Winstanley; David E H Theobald; Rudolf N Cardinal; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  19 in total

1.  Emerging perspectives in social neuroscience and neuroeconomics of aging.

Authors:  Lisbeth Nielsen; Mara Mather
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making.

Authors:  Michael T Bixter; Elizabeth M Trimber; Christian C Luhmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

3.  An adaptive, individualized fMRI delay discounting procedure to increase flexibility and optimize scanner time.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Jonathan M Lisinski; Anders Eklund; Warren K Bickel; Stephen M LaConte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex computes task-invariant relative subjective value for self and other.

Authors:  Matthew Piva; Kayla Velnoskey; Ruonan Jia; Amrita Nair; Ifat Levy; Steve Wc Chang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: A quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sylvia A Morelli; Matthew D Sacchet; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Towards a general model of temporal discounting.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Follow the heart or the head? The interactive influence model of emotion and cognition.

Authors:  Jiayi Luo; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-06

8.  What do I want and when do I want it: brain correlates of decisions made for self and other.

Authors:  Konstanze Albrecht; Kirsten G Volz; Matthias Sutter; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Decisions for others become less impulsive the further away they are on the family tree.

Authors:  Fenja V Ziegler; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Emotion, rationality, and decision-making: how to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory.

Authors:  Marco Verweij; Timothy J Senior; Juan F Domínguez D; Robert Turner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.