| Literature DB >> 20529765 |
Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec1, Jodi L Vanden Eng, Rosmarie Kelly, Daniel G Mead, Priti Kolhe, James Howgate, Uriel Kitron, Thomas R Burkot.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At present, the factors favoring transmission and amplification of West Nile Virus (WNV) within urban environments are poorly understood. In urban Atlanta, Georgia, the highly polluted waters of streams affected by combined sewer overflow (CSO) represent significant habitats for the WNV mosquito vector Culex quinquefasciatus. However, their contribution to the risk of WNV infection in humans and birds remains unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20529765 PMCID: PMC2957916 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1001939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
WNV infection in Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes, corvid carcasses, and humans, Fulton County, Georgia, USA, 2001–2007.
| Corvids | Humans | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | No. tested pools (no. individuals) | Average WNV infection rate | WNV-positive corvids (birds tested) | WNV-positive corvid death ratio | WNV cases | WNV incidence rate |
| 2001 | 216 (1,968) | 16.3 (11.3–22.9) | 49 (77) | 5.8 | 1 | 0.118 |
| 2002 | 749 (12,885) | 4.5 (3.4–5.8) | 242 (309) | 28.0 | 8 | 0.927 |
| 2003 | 256 (2,907) | 4.6 (2.6–7.7) | 19 (59) | 2.2 | 9 | 1.020 |
| 2004 | 490 (7,267) | 9.0 (7.0–11.5) | 10 (35) | 1.1 | 9 | 0.994 |
| 2005 | 750 (8,716) | 4.3 (3.0–5.8) | 1 (25) | 0.1 | 9 | 0.963 |
| 2006 | 247 (2,611) | 7.2 (4.4–11.1) | 0 (11) | 0.0 | 4 | 0.415 |
| 2007 | 267 (3,090) | 2.6 (1.2–5.0) | 0 (0) | 0.0 | 10 | 1.008 |
The number of infected mosquitoes per 1,000 tested, estimated using ML methods.
WNV-positive carcasses per 100,000 humans (WNV-positive corvid death ratios) or human cases per 100,000 (human WNV incidence rates). We used population estimates for every year (U.S. Census Bureau 2000) in the estimation.
Figure 1(A) Abundance (mosquitoes/trap-night), density distribution (mosquitoes/ha), and local spatial clustering of Cx. quinquefasciatus abundance, 2001–2007. (B) Distribution of WNV infections in Cx. quinquefasciatus and location of clusters of high ML WNV infection intensity [G*(d)] and presence (Bernoulli test) in mosquito pools (Cx. quinquefasciatus grouped according to date and location) tested during 2001–2007. Large insets show a detailed view of the city of Atlanta, whereas the upper right inset shows the location of Fulton County.
Summary of multiple logistic regression models used to evaluate the average abundance of Cx. quinquefasciatus (mosquitoes/trap-night) and WNV infection presence (presence/absence of WNV-positive pools in a trapping location), urban Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2001–2007.a
| Residential use | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response variable, model | Distance to CSO (m) | Distance to catch basin (m) | Tree cover range (%) | Mean tree cover (%) | Low (%) | Medium (%) | High (%) | Wetland (%) | Forest (%) | Barren land (%) | Elevation (m) | Constant | AIC | ΔAIC | ω |
| 1 | −1.2E–4 | — | 0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.67 | 2999.3 | 0.0 | 0.658 |
| 2 | −1.2E–4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.00 | 3001.6 | 2.3 | 0.208 |
| 3 | −1.4E–4 | 5.0E–4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.99 | 3002.7 | 3.4 | 0.120 |
| 4 | −1.3E–4 | 04.3E–4 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 4.10 | −4.63 | 0.88 | 1.33 | 8.28 | 79.32 | 0.03 | 1.79 | 3007.5 | 8.2 | 0.01 |
| 5 | — | — | — | — | 6.35 | 2.00 | 5.97 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 90.82 | −0.02 | 3.68 | 3012.2 | 12.9 | 0.01 |
| 6 | — | — | 0.12 | 0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −1.23 | 3012.2 | 12.9 | 0.01 |
| 7 | — | 4.8E–4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.32 | 3015.5 | 16.2 | 0.0 |
| ∑ω | 1.000 | 0.0 | 0.669 | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| WNV infection in | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | 6.9E–4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −1.26 | 406.2 | 0.0 | 0.559 |
| 2 | 7.5E–4 | 2.4E–4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −1.28 | 407.83 | 1.63 | 0.247 |
| 3 | — | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −3.70 | 408.8 | 2.6 | 0.152 |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | 1.40 | −4.44 | 0.04 | −3.33 | 3.33 | 22.19 | −0.03 | −1.88 | 412.15 | 5.95 | 0.029 |
| 5 | 2.1E–5 | 1.3E–4 | 0.04 | 1.31 | −1.23 | 1.55 | 6.51 | 6.95 | −4.07 | 21.23 | −0.01 | −4.03 | 413.9 | 7.7 | 0.012 |
| 6 | — | 3.5E–4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | −1.51 | 419.67 | 13.47 | 0.001 |
| ∑ω | 8.1E–1 | 0.0 | 0.152 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||
Results show the parameter estimates and significance for each factor; different models are ordered from best to worst.
Each candidate model had 455 observations. Observations were based on estimates performed within 1 km of a mosquito trap location. Dashes within the cells indicate that the factor was not included in the model; numbers represent the parameter estimate for each factor.
Akaike weights, ω = exp(−1/2 ΔAIC) / ∑exp((−1/2 ΔAIC).
p < 0.05.
Figure 2Distribution and spatial clustering of (A) EB-smoothed WNV human incidence rate estimates (cases/100,000 persons) and (B) WNV-positive corvid death ratios (number of dead corvids/100,000 persons) in Fulton County. Inset shows a detailed view of the city of Atlanta.
Summary of linear regression models evaluated for human WNV incidence rates and WNV-positive corvid death ratios per census tract in Atlanta, 2001–2007.a
| 2000 U.S. Census | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response variable Model | Mean distance to CSO (m) | Mean distance to catch basin (m) | Mean tree cover (%) | Mean elevation (m) | Percent houses 1950s–1960s | Median household income (U.S. dollars) | No. dead corvids | Constant | AIC | ΔAIC | ω |
| Human WNV incidence | |||||||||||
| 1 | −6E–5 | — | −0.0018 | — | 0.0276 | −1E–5 | −0.0362 | 3.60 | 309.0 | 0.0 | 0.817 |
| 2 | −6E–5 | 5E–5 | −0.0012 | −0.0018 | 0.0287 | −2E–5 | −0.032 | 4.13 | 313.1 | 4.1 | 0.105 |
| 3 | −8E–5 | 3E–5 | — | — | — | — | −0.117 | 2.65 | 314.8 | 5.8 | 0.04 |
| 4 | — | — | — | — | 0.0381 | −2E–5 | — | 3.58 | 316.8 | 7.8 | 0.02 |
| 5 | — | — | −0.020 | −0.0035 | — | — | — | 3.75 | 316.9 | 7.9 | 0.02 |
| ∑ω | 9.7E–1 | 0.0 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0.94 | 9.2E–1 | 0.04 | ||||
| WNV-positive corvid death ratio | |||||||||||
| 1 | −6E–4 | — | 0.194 | — | 0.1095 | 1.0E–5 | — | 4.26 | 707.0 | 0 | 0.913 |
| 2 | −6E–4 | 2E–5 | 0.215 | −0.0159 | 0.1023 | −6.0E–5 | — | 10.46 | 711.7 | 4.7 | 0.09 |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | 0.186 | 1.4E–4 | — | 1.19 | 728.2 | 21.2 | 0.00 |
| 4 | — | — | 0.172 | −0.0017 | — | — | — | 4.83 | 728.4 | 21.4 | 0.00 |
| 5 | −3E–4 | −1E–5 | — | — | — | — | — | 11.61 | 739.9 | 32.9 | 0.00 |
| ∑ω | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.1E–1 | |||||
Results show the parameter estimates and p-values for each predictor; different models are ordered from best to worst.
Each candidate model included 455 observations. Numbers indicate the parameter estimate for each variable included in a given model. Dependent variables (human WNV incidence rates and WNV-positive corvid death ratios) were log10+1 transformed, whereas independent variables were estimated over each census tract.
Akaike weights, ω = exp(−1/2 ΔAIC) / ∑exp((−1/2 ΔAIC).
After including variables with p < 0.07 in the estimation of ∑ω. Without including marginally significant variables, the sum of Akaike weights drop to 0.04.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.07.