Literature DB >> 20529238

Smart biomaterials - regulating cell behavior through signaling molecules.

Aneta J Mieszawska1, David L Kaplan.   

Abstract

Important advances in the field of tissue engineering are arising from increased interest in novel biomaterial designs with bioactive components that directly influence cell behavior. Following the recent work of Mitchell and co-workers published in BMC Biology, we review how spatial and temporal control of signaling molecules in a matrix material regulates cellular responses for tissue-specific applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20529238      PMCID: PMC2873335          DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Biol        ISSN: 1741-7007            Impact factor:   7.431


Commentary

Tissue engineering is an advanced interdisciplinary field that encompasses the design of artificial implant materials for in vivo tissue regeneration where mimicking the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) is often pursued. The natural ECM supports organ and tissue structure and function, and also regulates basic cellular functions like proliferation, growth, migration, differentiation, and survival. These functions are controlled through tissue-specific constituents, such as collagens, laminins, fibronectin or elastins, as well as functional molecules like growth factors or matricellular proteins, among others [1]. Novel biomaterials should allow for the gradual endogenous remodeling of native tissue leading to the replacement of implant material, manufactured to replace a missing biological structure, with fully functional ECM and cells that existed at the implant site prior to damage. The critical point during in vitro tissue engineering is to at least partially recreate conditions that mimic the natural ECM environment for particular cell types in order to support their function. Since cell contact with the biomaterial surface significantly influences cell behavior and performance, trends in biomaterial designs lean towards bioactive materials that can modulate and control cell behavior. In recent years, biomaterial designs have focused on the incorporation of signaling molecules into scaffold materials rather than using them in a diffusive or soluble form [1,2]. Among the most studied molecules are multifunctional proteins like growth factors [3-7] or cytokines [8], while there are also reports on the incorporation of small molecules like neurotransmitters [9] into scaffold materials (Figure 1). This review aims at highlighting examples of specific behavior of cell types that was enhanced with signaling molecules tethered to biomaterials.
Figure 1

Examples of signaling molecules modulating cell behavior in bioactive materials for tissue engineering. The ability of cells to respond to the biomaterial in a controllable manner is a decisive factor in successful disease treatments using engineered implant materials. Signaling molecules involve multifunctional proteins such as growth factors and cytokines, as well as small molecules like neurotransmitters.

Examples of signaling molecules modulating cell behavior in bioactive materials for tissue engineering. The ability of cells to respond to the biomaterial in a controllable manner is a decisive factor in successful disease treatments using engineered implant materials. Signaling molecules involve multifunctional proteins such as growth factors and cytokines, as well as small molecules like neurotransmitters.

Biomaterial-induced vascularization

The development of novel therapeutic approaches that stimulate the body to maintain the natural ability for new blood vessel formation is among challenges of tissue engineering. Endothelial cells play a key role in angiogenesis, through development of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels. Normally, endothelial cells have a low rate of proliferation but the proliferative capacity is retained and used during such events as wound healing. Fibroblast growth factors are multifunctional proteins involved in processes of proliferation and differentiation of a wide variety of cells and tissues through their stimulatory functions. Sahni and colleagues investigated the natural binding affinity of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), also known as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), to fibrin, a fibrous protein formed during wound healing processes, and the ability of FGF-2 to influence proliferation of endothelial cells in vitro [7]. Their results showed that fibrin-bound FGF-2 stimulated the growth and increased proliferation of endothelial cells, demonstrating the effect of surface immobilized FGF-2 on the proliferative capacity of endothelial cells. West and colleagues studied the influence of bFGF loaded into hydrogel scaffolds on smooth muscle cell (SMC) behavior [5]. The concentration gradient of bFGF within a gel led to the alignment of SMCs in the direction of increased bFGF concentration. Moreover, the bFGF gradient hydrogels increased SMC proliferation by approximately 41% and migration by approximately 15%, with cell migration observed in the direction of increased bFGF concentration, demonstrating control over cell mobility. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the other angiogenic protein capable of regulating new blood vessel formation. Influence of VEGF on cell behavior was studied by Zisch et al. [6]. VEGF enrichment of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-peptide hydrogels was critical for in vitro endothelial cell survival and migration within the gel environment. Also, hydrogel grafting on top of the embryonic chick chorioallontoic membrane led to pronounced VEGF-induced angiogenesis, with strong new blood vessel formation observed at the graft-membrane interface. A rat subcutaneous implant model with VEGF-loaded hydrogels showed complete remodeling of the implant material into native-like, vascularized tissue. Since locally induced angiogenesis plays an important role in tissue remodeling in vivo, in vitro strategies such as these may contribute significantly to new biomaterial designs that support therapeutic new vessel growth.

Modulation of cell proliferation and survival

A major challenge in the tissue engineering field is to provide the environment within the engineered biomaterial to support cellular proliferation and survival, a hallmark of functional tissue. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells able to differentiate into different cell types for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering needs. In vivo animal models using MSCs for reconstitution of damaged tissues such as cartilage, bone, muscle, and tendon have shown positive outcomes and promise for human applications. Many clinical approaches for disease treatment using MSCs, like filling large bone defects, will require the implantation of MSCs loaded in or attached to scaffold materials and this could induce an inflammatory response causing large cell losses. Fan and coworkers proposed the incorporation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) into a synthetic polymer matrix material to increase cell survival under such conditions [4]. They found that surface-exposed EGF promoted cell attachment to the matrix material and increased MSC spreading and survival when compared with media containing solubilized EGF. Also, MSCs in contact with surface-tethered EGF displayed a higher resistance to cell death induced by proinflamatory cytokines. These findings provided insight into cell responses to bioactive surfaces and the need to provide local, spatially controlled distribution of signaling molecules on a biomaterial surface. Improving MSC-implant interactions has the potential to enhance cell survival significantly in clinical disease treatments.

Regeneration of neurons

Nerve growth factor (NGF) covalently immobilized on patterned polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) surfaces was studied for its potential to induce neuron responses [3]. PDMS is a highly viscoelastic polymer that upon crosslinking and hardening molds the surface patterns it was cast on. Gomez and coworkers [3] investigated the impact of microchannel-patterned PDMS surface on the rate of axon initiation and overall axon length of embryonic hippocampal neurons. The influence of NGF on axon formation was lower (27%) when compared to the influence of PDMS microtopography, which was the decisive factor leading to a 68% increase in axon initiation. Nevertheless, the immobilized NGF played the major role in enhancement of axon length, with an increase of about 10%. The most pronounced effect was observed when the two stimuli, microchannels and tethered NGF, were present simultaneously on the PDMS surface, resulting in a synergistic 25% increase in axon length with enhanced initiation due to surface topography and improved growth from NGF. Another interesting approach to stimulate neurite outgrowth was a bioactive diglycidyl ester polymer bearing dopamine residues [9]. The neurotransmitter activity enhanced neurite outgrowth and induced differentiation in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells, while the diffusive dopamine added to the culture medium had a negligible effect.

Bone formation in vitro

There is a high demand for novel bone replacement materials that can actively support new bone tissue formation in therapeutic treatment of bone loss diseases. There are numerous reports on bone remodeling studies using different scaffolds either in single component or multi-component systems. An example of bone remodeling in vitro using bioactive molecules is the report from Birch and colleagues [10] where two different osteogenesis-promoting ligands were immobilized on gold surface. The cell adhesive motif was derived from osteopontin (OPN), a prominent component of mineralized extracellular matrix and the second motif that supported osteoblast differentiation and function was derived from bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, known to influence the development of bone and cartilage. The proposed strategy involved genetic engineering of recombinant fusion proteins where each motif was cloned between the bacterial protein TolAIII, which acted as a scaffold material to support and expose the bioactive OPN and BMP-2 ligands, and Cysteine containing C-terminus tag, used to self-assemble the constructs on gold surfaces. This system provided a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of fusion protein construct on a gold surface that displayed the ligand motifs in highly reproducible manner. This is a fundamental study that provides an insight into cell behavior in the presence of immobilized bioactive ligands. The OPN construct promoted cellular adhesion and spreading of primary rat osteoblasts through the formation of vinculin adhesion sites. The BMP-2 constructs drove in vitro bone formation for over 28 days without the addition of external osteogenic stimuli. The spatial patterning of the BMP-2 ligand led to the local control of osteogenesis and mineralization of the extracellular matrix, offering insight into the spatial control of cell differentiation towards this phenotype.

Retention of stem cell phenotype

Diffusible leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is often used in mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) culture to retain the cells in an undifferentiated state. Immobilization of cytokines such as LIF and stem cell factor (SCF) to maleic anhydride copolymer thin-film coatings proposed by Alberti and coworkers [8] investigated control over stem cell fate through spatially constrained ligand presentation that provides quantitative control of the signaling ligands at material-cell interfaces. The results showed that mESCs cultured on immobilized LIF surfaces retained pluripotency for at least 2 weeks in culture and, more importantly, that the immobilized LIF ligands were capable of activating the LIF-specific cellular signaling pathways, which support the self-renewal of mESCs in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. The significance of these findings comes from the fact that in vivo LIF is produced in two isoforms, a diffusible and also matrix-associated form, where the concentration of LIF in both cases is a decisive factor in activation of the LIF-specific signaling pathway. Thus, achievement of precise quantitative control over the polymer-immobilized LIF cytokine may have a great impact in the tissue engineering field. Additionally, ECM coatings on the polymer-LIF surfaces did not affect the ligand accessibility and cell-ligand interaction. This leads to controlling the cell fate through a synergistic effect of ECM of choice and an immobilized cytokine, which broadens the potential applications of this system. The work discussed in this review represents the emerging area of study aimed at influencing cell behavior through the use of signaling molecules immobilized in biomaterials for tissue engineering needs. These examples follow a trend towards 'smart' bioactive material designs where cell performance can be tuned through the control of dose and spatial distribution of bioactive compounds within tissue scaffolding materials.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering.

Authors:  L Bacáková; E Filová; F Rypácek; V Svorcík; V Starý
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.881

2.  Tethered epidermal growth factor provides a survival advantage to mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Vivian H Fan; Kenichi Tamama; Ada Au; Romie Littrell; Llewellyn B Richardson; John W Wright; Alan Wells; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  A neuroinductive biomaterial based on dopamine.

Authors:  Jin Gao; Yu Mi Kim; Herna Coe; Blaine Zern; Barbara Sheppard; Yadong Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  William P Daley; Sarah B Peters; Melinda Larsen
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Immobilized nerve growth factor and microtopography have distinct effects on polarization versus axon elongation in hippocampal cells in culture.

Authors:  Natalia Gomez; Yi Lu; Shaochen Chen; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Potentiation of endothelial cell proliferation by fibrin(ogen)-bound fibroblast growth factor-2.

Authors:  A Sahni; L A Sporn; C W Francis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Covalently immobilized gradients of bFGF on hydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migration.

Authors:  Solitaire A DeLong; James J Moon; Jennifer L West
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Controlled spatial and conformational display of immobilised bone morphogenetic protein-2 and osteopontin signalling motifs regulates osteoblast adhesion and differentiation in vitro.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mitchell; Benjamin T Chaffey; Andrew W McCaskie; Jeremy H Lakey; Mark A Birch
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Cell-demanded release of VEGF from synthetic, biointeractive cell ingrowth matrices for vascularized tissue growth.

Authors:  Andreas H Zisch; Matthias P Lutolf; Martin Ehrbar; George P Raeber; Simone C Rizzi; Neil Davies; Hugo Schmökel; Deon Bezuidenhout; Valentin Djonov; Peter Zilla; Jeffrey A Hubbell
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Functional immobilization of signaling proteins enables control of stem cell fate.

Authors:  Kristin Alberti; Ryan E Davey; Kento Onishi; Sophia George; Katrin Salchert; F Philipp Seib; Martin Bornhäuser; Tilo Pompe; Andras Nagy; Carsten Werner; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 28.547

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  New biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Diana Chicon Paez; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-01

Review 2.  Matricellular proteins and biomaterials.

Authors:  Aaron H Morris; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 3.  Dynamic manipulation of hydrogels to control cell behavior: a review.

Authors:  Kanika Vats; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Regenerative medicine as applied to general surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Orlando; Kathryn J Wood; Paolo De Coppi; Pedro M Baptista; Kyle W Binder; Khalil N Bitar; Christopher Breuer; Luke Burnett; George Christ; Alan Farney; Marina Figliuzzi; James H Holmes; Kenneth Koch; Paolo Macchiarini; Sayed-Hadi Mirmalek Sani; Emmanuel Opara; Andrea Remuzzi; Jeffrey Rogers; Justin M Saul; Dror Seliktar; Keren Shapira-Schweitzer; Tom Smith; Daniel Solomon; Mark Van Dyke; James J Yoo; Yuanyuan Zhang; Anthony Atala; Robert J Stratta; Shay Soker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Smart Radiation Therapy Biomaterials.

Authors:  Wilfred Ngwa; Francis Boateng; Rajiv Kumar; Darrell J Irvine; Silvia Formenti; Twalib Ngoma; Carsten Herskind; Marlon R Veldwijk; Georg Lars Hildenbrand; Michael Hausmann; Frederik Wenz; Juergen Hesser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Low power, biologically benign NIR light triggers polymer disassembly.

Authors:  Nadezda Fomina; Cathryn L McFearin; Marleen Sermsakdi; José M Morachis; Adah Almutairi
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.985

7.  Mapping calcium phosphate activated gene networks as a strategy for targeted osteoinduction of human progenitors.

Authors:  Jeroen Eyckmans; Scott J Roberts; Johanna Bolander; Jan Schrooten; Christopher S Chen; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Tunable Keratin Hydrogels for Controlled Erosion and Growth Factor Delivery.

Authors:  Trevor R Ham; Ryan T Lee; Sangheon Han; Salma Haque; Yael Vodovotz; Junnan Gu; Luke R Burnett; Seth Tomblyn; Justin M Saul
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 6.988

9.  Biomolecule gradient in micropatterned nanofibrous scaffold for spatiotemporal release.

Authors:  Walter Bonani; Antonella Motta; Claudio Migliaresi; Wei Tan
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 10.  Nanoparticles and their potential for application in bone.

Authors:  Andrea Tautzenberger; Anna Kovtun; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.