OBJECTIVES: To predict acute psychological distress in pregnant women following detection of a fetal structural anomaly by ultrasonography, and to relate these findings to a comparison group. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre for fetal medicine. POPULATION: One hundred and eighty pregnant women with a fetal structural anomaly detected by ultrasound (study group) and 111 with normal ultrasound findings (comparison group) were included within a week following sonographic examination after gestational age 12 weeks (inclusion period: May 2006 to February 2009). METHODS: Social dysfunction and health perception were assessed by the corresponding subscales of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Psychological distress was assessed using the Impact of Events Scale (IES-22), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the anxiety and depression subscales of the GHQ-28. Fetal anomalies were classified according to severity and diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity at the time of assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress (intrusion, avoidance, arousal, anxiety, depression). RESULTS: The least severe anomalies with no diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity induced the lowest levels of IES intrusive distress (P = 0.025). Women included after 22 weeks of gestation (24%) reported significantly higher GHQ distress than women included earlier in pregnancy (P = 0.003). The study group had significantly higher levels of psychosocial distress than the comparison group on all psychometric endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress was predicted by gestational age at the time of assessment, severity of the fetal anomaly, and ambiguity concerning diagnosis or prognosis.
OBJECTIVES: To predict acute psychological distress in pregnant women following detection of a fetal structural anomaly by ultrasonography, and to relate these findings to a comparison group. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre for fetal medicine. POPULATION: One hundred and eighty pregnant women with a fetal structural anomaly detected by ultrasound (study group) and 111 with normal ultrasound findings (comparison group) were included within a week following sonographic examination after gestational age 12 weeks (inclusion period: May 2006 to February 2009). METHODS:Social dysfunction and health perception were assessed by the corresponding subscales of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). Psychological distress was assessed using the Impact of Events Scale (IES-22), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the anxiety and depression subscales of the GHQ-28. Fetal anomalies were classified according to severity and diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity at the time of assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress (intrusion, avoidance, arousal, anxiety, depression). RESULTS: The least severe anomalies with no diagnostic or prognostic ambiguity induced the lowest levels of IES intrusive distress (P = 0.025). Women included after 22 weeks of gestation (24%) reported significantly higher GHQ distress than women included earlier in pregnancy (P = 0.003). The study group had significantly higher levels of psychosocial distress than the comparison group on all psychometric endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress was predicted by gestational age at the time of assessment, severity of the fetal anomaly, and ambiguity concerning diagnosis or prognosis.
Authors: Sylvie Viaux-Savelon; Marc Dommergues; Ouriel Rosenblum; Nicolas Bodeau; Elizabeth Aidane; Odile Philippon; Philippe Mazet; Claude Vibert-Guigue; Danièle Vauthier-Brouzes; Ruth Feldman; David Cohen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jane E Schreiber; Joanna C M Cole; Amy J Houtrow; Michael J Kallan; Elizabeth A Thom; Lori J Howell; N Scott Adzick Journal: Fetal Diagn Ther Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 2.208
Authors: Anne Kaasen; Anne Helbig; Ulrik Fredrik Malt; Tormod Naes; Hans Skari; Guttorm Nils Haugen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Nasrin Javid; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Lesley E Halliday; Greg Duncombe; Caroline S E Homer Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 3.007