Literature DB >> 20527764

Life cycle environmental impacts of selected U.S. ethanol production and use pathways in 2022.

David D Hsu1, Daniel Inman, Garvin A Heath, Edward J Wolfrum, Margaret K Mann, Andy Aden.   

Abstract

Projected life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and net energy value (NEV) of high-ethanol blend fuel (E85) used to propel a passenger car in the United States are evaluated using attributional life cycle assessment. Input data represent national-average conditions projected to 2022 for ethanol produced from corn grain, corn stover, wheat straw, switchgrass, and forest residues. Three conversion technologies are assessed: advanced dry mill (corn grain), biochemical (switchgrass, corn stover, wheat straw), and thermochemical (forest residues). A reference case is compared against results from Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. For this case, one kilometer traveled on E85 from the feedstock-to-ethanol pathways evaluated has 43%-57% lower GHG emissions than a car operated on conventional U.S. gasoline (base year 2005). Differences in NEV cluster by conversion technology rather than by feedstock. The reference case estimates of GHG and NEV skew to the tails of the estimated frequency distributions. Though not as optimistic as the reference case, the projected median GHG and NEV for all feedstock-to-E85 pathways evaluated offer significant improvement over conventional U.S. gasoline. Sensitivity analysis suggests that inputs to the feedstock production phase are the most influential parameters for GHG and NEV. Results from this study can be used to help focus research and development efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20527764     DOI: 10.1021/es100186h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  A Comparison of Major Petroleum Life Cycle Models.

Authors:  Donald Vineyard; Wesley W Ingwersen
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Analysis of the Global Warming Potential of Biogenic CO2 Emission in Life Cycle Assessments.

Authors:  Weiguo Liu; Zhonghui Zhang; Xinfeng Xie; Zhen Yu; Klaus von Gadow; Junming Xu; Shanshan Zhao; Yuchun Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comprehensive environmental assessment: a meta-assessment approach.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Genya Dana; Patricia Gillespie; Maureen R Gwinn; Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Thomas C Long; Amy Wang; J Michael Davis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 9.028

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.