Literature DB >> 20526685

Why we need response shift: an appeal to functionalism.

David T Eton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20526685     DOI： 10.1007/s11136-010-9684-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; C E Schwartz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies.

Authors:  Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Why should changing the bathwater have to harm the baby?

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  An opportunity to refine our understanding of "response shift" and to educate researchers on designing quality research studies: response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Abandoning the language of "response shift": a plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Yvette Peeters; Dylan Smith
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Rita Bode; Nicholas Repucci; Janine Becker; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Do not throw out the baby with the bath water: build on current approaches to realize conceptual clarity. Response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Population-level response shift: novel implications for research.

Authors:  Darren Lau; Calypse Agborsangaya; Fatima Al Sayah; Xiuyun Wu; Arto Ohinmaa; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Compared to what? A joint evaluation method for assessing quality of life.

Authors:  Heather P Lacey; George Loewenstein; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Anticipated adaptation or scale recalibration?

Authors:  Yvette Edelaar-Peeters; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Using a retrospective pretest instead of a conventional pretest is replacing biases: a qualitative study of cognitive processes underlying responses to thentest items.

Authors:  Elsbeth F Taminiau-Bloem; Carolyn E Schwartz; Florence J van Zuuren; Margot A Koeneman; Mechteld R M Visser; Carol Tishelman; Caro C E Koning; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A Matter of Taste? Quality of Life in Day-to-Day Living with ALS and a Feeding Tube.

Authors:  Jeannette Pols; Sarah Limburg
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09

6.  Response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures: a commentary to The Response Shift-in Sync Working Group initiative.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Tolulope Sajobi; Antoine Vanier; Nancy E Mayo; Richard Sawatzky; Lisa M Lix; Frans J Oort; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.